What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the category of formulating talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges, involving three types of materials: talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. Talent cultivation programs are revised under the leadership of the academic affairs department, course standards are updated by each major's teaching and research office on an academic-year basis, and job competency analysis tables come from enterprise research and feedback from the professional construction committee. The three types of materials play different roles when entering the knowledge base retrieval service: talent cultivation programs provide fields for major positioning and course structure, course standards provide fields for class hours, credits, and assessment methods, and job competency analysis tables provide fields for job titles, competency items, and research dates. The materials enter the retrieval node in document form and, after recall, merging, reranking, and truncation, form candidate chunks and similarity scores, which subsequent nodes or humans use to generate a handover-ready deployment status and operation records. In terms of update cadence, programs are adjusted with policy and evaluation cycles, course standards roll over by semester, and job competency analysis tables are supplemented by research batch; the versions and dates of the three must be aligned before retrieval.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merging, reranking, filtering, and upper-limit truncation). The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are then completed by subsequent nodes or humans.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | The major name, number of courses, revision date, and signature fields should be consistent between the program and the course standards | In the search test, search by major name, check the names, quantities, and dates in the returned candidates, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Course standard | Class hours, credits, assessment methods, and the corresponding course names should match between the two materials | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare whether the candidates contain both types of results at the same time, and record the similarity score |
| Job competency analysis table | Job titles, competency items, research dates, and receipt signatures should be complete and version-synchronized | Compare the order of the first few items before and after enabling reranking, check the usingReRank status, and separately record the number of items in the reference array and the limit truncation situation |
| Deployment status and operation records | Version, connection, and task records are consistent, and each item on the handover form is verifiable | Check the retrieval node connection and task records item by item according to the handover form, and confirm that the candidates and referenced content fully retain the key original text chunks |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or class hours of the same course do not match between the program and the course standard. Cause: The two materials are from different revision batches, and versions and dates were not aligned before retrieval.
- Symptom: The job competency analysis table lacks a signature or receipt, making the source unconfirmable at handover. Cause: Research records were not archived in sync with the materials, and the task records lack the corresponding entries.
- Symptom: Key passages cannot be recalled when the question is phrased differently. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, or the candidate order changes after reranking and filtering/truncation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle reranking on and off to observe the ordering of the first few items, and record the number of candidates, similarity, and usingReRank status.
Business test: check once item by item according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and confirm that version, connection, and task records are consistent.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand search once each with semantic, full-text, and hybrid, recording the number of candidates and scores. - Search once each with reranking enabled and disabled, compare the order of the first few items, and check
usingReRankand the tokens of the referenced text afterlimittruncation.