What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials usually include three types: the program setup filing form, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment list. Fields cover program name, code, study duration, enrollment number, number of teachers, number of equipment units, justification date, and signature and seal. Material sources are college submissions, education administrative department acceptance receipts, and correction notices, and the update cadence advances according to the annual filing cycle and correction rounds. The program setup filing form plays the role of the main record, talent demand justification plays a supporting role, and the faculty and equipment list plays the role of condition verification. When the three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, each is split and indexed as an independent segment for comparison of fields and dates during the acceptance stage.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate segments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). "Acceptance records and follow-up questions for completion" are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | The program name, code, study duration, and enrollment number are consistent within the form, and the date and signature are complete | In the search test, test once each with synonymous questions, check the candidate segments and scores, and record the number of candidates |
| Talent demand justification | The justification conclusion matches the program name, quantity, and date in the filing form, and the signature or receipt is not missing | Switch searchMode to hybrid and see whether the returned candidates include both semantic and full-text results |
| Faculty and equipment list | The number of teachers and number of equipment units match those filled in the filing form, and the version is the latest | Enable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few items, and check the cited text after similarity filtering |
| Acceptance records and follow-up questions for completion | Missing items are identified and followed up, and answers have material evidence | Check whether the number of returned citations and the key original text segments are complete; the citation upper limit only checks cited text tokens |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The program name and quantity for the same record do not match between the filing form and the justification material. Cause: The two materials were filled in separately, and no field-level comparison was performed.
- Phenomenon: The version of the faculty and equipment list was not synchronized, and old-version data was cited during acceptance. Cause: After correction, the new version was not re-ingested or did not overwrite the old segment.
- Phenomenon: The filing form lacks a signature or receipt, but the acceptance record still proceeds as complete material. Cause: Missing-item identification did not trigger follow-up, and it went directly to the handler.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to inspect the ranking of the top few items.
Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it first follows up before answering.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeto semantic, full-text, and hybrid, and record the number of candidates and thesimilarityscore respectively. - Run once with
usingReRankenabled and once disabled, and compare the ranking of the top few items; the citation upper limit only checks cited text tokens, and the number of array items is recorded separately.