What this category's data looks like
Vocational training subsidy applications involve three types of materials: training class opening filings, sign-in records, and completion assessment forms. The opening filing contains the institution name, training program, start and end dates, and trainee roster; sign-in records are generated daily and contain trainee name, sign-in time, and signature field; the completion assessment form contains assessment subjects, scores, assessor signature, and institution seal. The materials are generated by the training institution in stages before the class starts, during training, and at completion, and are updated as training progresses; the field characteristics are that four types of elements—name, quantity, date, and signature—appear repeatedly. When entering the forms and interaction stage, the opening filing assumes the role of source information, sign-in records assume the role of process evidence, and the completion assessment form assumes the role of result confirmation; the fields of the three must correspond item by item in the form, forming a signable material draft and handover record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, and outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The signable material draft and handover record are completed by subsequent nodes or manually afterward. After the node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training class opening filing | The institution name, training program, start and end dates, and trainee roster are consistent item by item with the corresponding fields in the sign-in records and completion assessment form | Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that the opening filing fields correspond one-to-one with the sign-in record and completion assessment form fields |
| Sign-in records | Trainee names, sign-in times, and quantities match the opening filing roster and the completion assessment form roster, and the signature field has no blanks | Check the required settings one by one, set the name, date, and signature in the sign-in records as required, and after submission check whether subsequent nodes can retrieve the corresponding field values |
| Completion assessment form | Assessment subjects, scores, assessor signature, and institution seal are synchronized with the date version of the opening filing and sign-in records | Reference the formInputResult field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, confirm that the completion assessment form field values are passed completely, and that missing items are blocked by the required markers |
| Form input node | Required markers cover key material fields, and after submission the fields are passed to subsequent nodes | Check the required settings one by one, reference the formInputResult and selectResult fields in subsequent nodes, and run a trial |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same trainee name is written differently in the opening filing and sign-in records, and the quantities do not match. Cause: During material drafting, the field definitions were not unified, and the form field names did not correspond one-to-one with the material fields.
- Phenomenon: The date on the completion assessment form is inconsistent with the start and end dates of the opening filing, and the versions are not synchronized. Cause: Multiple materials were drafted separately, the update rhythms differed, and no version comparison was done before submission.
- Phenomenon: The sign-in records lack trainee signatures, and the handover record lacks a receipt. Cause: Required markers did not cover the signature and receipt fields, so after submission subsequent nodes could not retrieve the values, and the handover step could not be signed for.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Fill out the form once and submit it, check whether the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes are consistent with what was filled in, and confirm that the formInputResult and selectResult fields are passed completely and that submission is impossible when required items are empty.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, and ensure that the opening filing, sign-in record, and completion assessment form fields correspond one-to-one with the form fields
- Check the required settings one by one, set name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt as required, and after submission reference the
formInputResultfield in subsequent nodes and run a trial