What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the modern apprenticeship and order class management scenario, and the materials include three types: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice mentoring records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements usually contain the cooperating enterprise name, major, number of people, start and end dates, and signatures and seals of both parties, and their update cadence follows the academic year or project cycle; order class training plans contain the class name, course modules, job direction, assessment method, and approval signature, and are revised as the teaching plan is adjusted; master-apprentice mentoring records contain the apprentice name, master name, mentoring start and end dates, job, and master's signature receipt, and are filled in weekly or monthly. When these three types of materials enter the question intake and missing-item follow-up function, they respectively serve as the basis for the agreement, the basis for the training arrangement, and the basis for the process record, and are used to determine whether the fields required by the question are complete and to trigger follow-up questions when items are missing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), and outputs the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). "Intake records and completed question items" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. Based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to call the tool this time.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Whether the fields include the cooperating enterprise name, major, number of people, start and end dates, and signatures and seals of both parties, and whether they are consistent with the name, quantity, and dates in the order class training plan | Open the agreement and the training plan, compare the name, number of people, and dates item by item, verify whether the signatures and seals are complete, and check whether the tool calling node connection has been connected to the target tool |
| Order class training plan | Whether the fields include the class name, course modules, job direction, assessment method, and approval signature, and whether the version is synchronized with the latest teaching plan | Check the plan version number and approval date, compare with the job direction in the mentoring records, and confirm that there is no unsynchronized version or missing field |
| Master-apprentice mentoring record | Whether the fields include the apprentice name, master name, mentoring start and end dates, job, and master's signature receipt, and whether the dates are consistent with the training plan | Spot-check the names, dates, and jobs in the records, compare with the training plan, confirm that signatures or receipts are not missing, and check whether the input parameters and return contain values that do not exist in the materials |
| Tool calling node | Whether the call is decided according to the tool introduction and whether parameters are required, whether it may fabricate parameter values on its own when there are no required parameters, and whether it may fail to call when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context | Run a trial with a question missing required fields, check the input parameters and return in the call record, observe whether it asks a follow-up question first, guide the user to provide parameters with a prompt if necessary, and check the values of toolChoice and functionCall |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same apprentice name is written differently in the training plan and the mentoring record, and the number of people and start and end dates do not match. Cause: the two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and synchronization.
- Phenomenon: the training plan has been revised, but the mentoring record still uses the old version's job direction and assessment method. Cause: the version is not synchronized, and the receipt and notification steps after revision are missing.
- Phenomenon: the agreement or mentoring record lacks a signature or receipt, but the question answering still gives an intake conclusion. Cause: the model does not call the tool to verify the fields and answers directly based on the context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run a trial with a question missing required parameters, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the introduction; at the same time, check whether the values of toolChoice and functionCall correspond to the three items: tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering.
- Open the tool node introduction field, check whether the description can be understood when taken out on its own, and check the parameter introduction and whether required items one by one.
- On the canvas, check the diamond connection and node status, confirm that it is connected to the target tool, and run a trial with a question missing fields to observe whether it asks a follow-up question first.