What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like Vocational college skills competition organization involves three types of materials: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. The sources are the academic affairs office and the organizing department, and they are updated according to the competition event cycle. Competition regulations include the event name, group, date, and seal; registration forms include contestant and instructor fields, quantities, and signatures; training plans include phase arrangements, dates, and review signatures. When the materials enter the form input node, each plays its own role in supplying fields: the regulations provide the event and date standards, the registration form provides personnel and quantities, and the training plan provides training nodes and signature basis. Q&A acceptance and missing-item follow-up depend on the alignment of these fields. The name, quantity, and date of the same record in the regulations and the registration form must be consistent, the versions must be synchronized, and signatures or receipts must be complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). "Acceptance records and items to be completed" are then handled by subsequent nodes or manually. The form does not automatically recognize material content, nor does it determine whether materials are authentic.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the event name, group, date, and signature are consistent with the registration form | Check field names and required markers one by one, and confirm that the regulation fields correspond one-to-one with the registration form fields |
| Registration form | Whether contestant and instructor names, quantities, and dates match the regulations | Check the required item settings, and inspect whether the name and quantity of the same record are consistent in the two materials |
| Training plan | Whether phase dates, review signatures, and receipts are complete and versions are synchronized | Reference the formInputResult field values in subsequent nodes and run a trial to confirm that the corresponding fields are retrieved |
| Form input node | Whether submission is possible when required items are empty, and whether fields can be passed after submission | Check the field references of userSelect and formInput, and run a trial to verify the passing |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record in the regulations and the registration form do not match. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and no field alignment check was performed.
- Symptom: The training plan version is not synchronized, and the old version's dates conflict with the new version's regulations. Cause: The update rhythm is inconsistent, and there is a lack of version verification actions.
- Symptom: The registration form lacks a signature or receipt, and the acceptance record cannot be transferred to the organizer. Cause: The required marker does not cover the signature field, and submission is not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: fill out the form once and submit it, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, and confirm that the formInputResult and selectResult references are correct and that submission is not possible when required items are empty.
Business test: submit a question that lacks key information, see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering, and check that the answer is based on materials.
- In the node configuration, check field names and required markers one by one to ensure they correspond one-to-one with the fields of the competition regulations, registration form, and training plan.
- Reference the
formInputResultfields in subsequent nodes and run a trial to confirm that field values can be passed after submission and that the conversation does not get stuck in the interaction state.