Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Professional Qualification Exam Applications: Handle Questions and Collect Missing Information

Professional Exams: review conversation for question intake. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

This page addresses the professional and technical personnel vocational qualification examination registration review scenario; the category materials include three types: the registration form, the academic qualification certificate, and the work experience certificate. The registration form is filled in by the applicant and enters intake after preliminary review by the employer; it contains name, ID number, examination level, work start and end dates, signature, and receipt column. The academic qualification certificate is issued by the graduating institution or a certification body; it contains institution name, major, graduation date, and certificate number. The work experience certificate is issued by the employing unit; it contains position, start and end dates, handler's signature, and official seal. In the intake stage, the three types of materials respectively assume three verification roles: identity and examination eligibility, academic qualification compliance, and work experience compliance; fields are mainly of four types: name, quantity, date, and signature. The update cadence rolls with registration batches, and material versions may be submitted multiple times due to corrections, employer changes, or academic certification progress. When materials enter this feature, the registration form serves as the main record carrying question-item attribution, while the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate serve as comparison bases, used to identify whether the names and dates of the same record match across the two materials, and whether signatures or receipts are missing.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, outputting the historical message range referenced and the answer constraints. The intake record and the completed question items are then completed by the model; the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. Memory turns control how many previous turns of conversation can be referenced at most when answering; the value only needs to match the preceding context range required by the question.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Registration formCheck fields, dates, and signatures: whether name, ID number, examination level, and work start and end dates are consistent with the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate, and whether the signature and receipt column are completeIn the app settings, check the current value of memory turns, run a trial with two consecutive questions, observe whether the second turn carries over the reference from the first turn, and check the reference scope of messages and chatId
Academic qualification certificateCheck whether institution name, major, graduation date, and certificate number match what is filled in on the registration form, and whether the names and dates of the same record are consistent across the two materialsCompare the usage records of two runs to confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check whether the fields brought in via variables fall within the range required by this question item
Work experience certificateCheck position, start and end dates, handler's signature, and official seal, and determine whether a missing signature or receipt is identified as a missing item and followed up with a questionRun a trial with two consecutive questions, use a reference in the second question, and check whether the missing item is first followed up on before answering; at the same time, check whether the opening message in messages is mistakenly treated as preceding context
Intake record and completed question itemsMissing items are identified and followed up on, answers have material basis, and question items are attributed to the corresponding materials and fieldsIn the app settings, check whether the value of memory turns matches the preceding context range required by the question, and confirm that the answer constraints cover the material basis requirement

Three common errors

  • Symptom: when the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question. Cause: the value of memory turns is too small, the preceding context information is not brought in, and consecutive follow-up questions cannot carry over the reference object from the first turn.
  • Symptom: the names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match across the two materials. Cause: the versions of the registration form, academic qualification certificate, and work experience certificate are not synchronized, and after correction only one material is updated.
  • Symptom: materials missing a signature or receipt are directly accepted. Cause: the prompt configuration does not require first following up on missing items, and the model still answers based on existing fields when information is insufficient.

How to verify the setup

Feature acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries over the reference from the first question. In the app settings, check the current value of memory turns; after the trial run, check the reference scope of messages and chatId, and confirm that the reference object of the second question is consistent with the first question.

Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it first follows up before answering. For example, provide only the registration form information and omit the signature on the work experience certificate, and observe whether it first follows up on the signature and receipt, then gives the intake record and completed question items.

  • In the app settings, check the current value of memory turns, compare it with the preceding context range required by this question item, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and record whether the second turn carries over the reference from the first turn.
  • Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns; check whether the fields brought in via variables fall within what is required by this question item, and check that the opening message is not treated as preceding context.