What this category's data looks like
The intake materials for corporate new-hire onboarding training typically include three types: the onboarding training plan, the course sign-in sheet, and the job description. The onboarding training plan is published by the training department before the batch starts, and contains the course name, date, class hours, instructor, and participant scope; the course sign-in sheet is compiled by the on-site organizer after each class, and contains the name, employee ID, course, sign-in time, and signature; the job description is jointly maintained by the hiring department and Human Resources, and contains the job title, responsibilities, qualification requirements, and effective date. The three types of materials update at different rhythms: the plan updates by batch, the sign-in sheet updates by session, and the job description updates by job adjustment. When the materials enter workflow orchestration, the onboarding training plan serves as the comparison baseline for the intake question, the course sign-in sheet serves as evidence of attendance and completion, and the job description serves as the basis for matching jobs with courses; the fields, dates, and signatures of the three must be aligned item by item.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding Training Plan | Whether the course names, dates, class hours, and participation scope in the plan correspond consistently with the sign-in sheets and job descriptions, and whether signatures and versions are complete | Compare course names and dates item by item, verify the plan version number and issuance records, and confirm that no fields are missing |
| Course Sign-in Sheet | Whether the names, employee IDs, courses, and sign-in times in the sign-in sheet match the planned courses and the position information in the job descriptions, and whether signatures or receipts are complete | Check sign-in records against planned course names by session, inspect rows missing signatures or receipts, and mark items pending follow-up |
| Job Description | Whether the job title, responsibilities, and qualification requirements are consistent with the course setup in the training plan and the positions of the sign-in personnel, and whether the effective date is later than the plan release | Verify job titles and effective dates, compare the coverage of planned courses, and record places where versions are not synchronized |
| User Selection Node | Whether each option corresponds to a branch, whether the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and whether the interaction state is recorded | Check options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once to view the node status in the run record, reference variables in subsequent nodes, and run a test once |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name and date of the same course do not match between the plan and the sign-in sheet. Cause: the two materials are maintained by different roles, update at different rhythms, and lack unified field verification.
- Symptom: the job description version is not synchronized, and the course coverage deviates from the job responsibilities. Cause: the description was not updated in time after a job adjustment, and the plan is still orchestrated according to the old version.
- Symptom: the sign-in sheet lacks signatures or receipts, so attendance and completion cannot serve as a basis. Cause: the signature step was omitted during on-site compilation, and receipts were archived before being collected.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and that the nodeId and variables references are consistent.
Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger it once to view the node state in the run records, and confirm that the interaction state is recorded.
- Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run a trial to check whether the variable has been passed in correctly.