What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of the establishment and annual reports of Chinese-foreign cooperatively run educational institutions. The materials come from three types of texts—the establishment application, the cooperation agreement, and the articles of association—as well as annual report filing records and receipts. The establishment application provides the institution name, educational level, cooperating parties, proposed person in charge, signature, and date; the cooperation agreement provides the cooperation term, contribution method, quantity, and seals; the articles of association provide the governance structure, rules of procedure, and signature page. Materials enter in parallel as scanned copies and structured fields, and the update cadence advances on a rolling basis according to batch acceptance and annual submission. The three types of materials corroborate one another on the same record: the application is the main record entry point, the agreement and articles of association are the basis for fields and signatures, and the annual report records and receipts are used to compare historical versions. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: names, quantities, dates, and signatures. Situations such as the same name written differently, the same quantity with different values, and the same date with different versions across materials need to be aligned item by item.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call it, and the node executes it), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). "Acceptance records and items to be completed" are then handled by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. The node itself does not directly generate business documents, ledgers, or authorization scopes.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | Category verification dimensions: whether the institution name, educational level, cooperating parties, proposed person in charge, signature, and date are complete | Open the application field by field, verify the name spelling, date, and signature position, and record missing items |
| Cooperation agreement | Category verification dimensions: whether the cooperation term, contribution method, quantity, seals, and receipts are consistent with the application | Compare the names, quantities, and dates in the agreement and the application, and mark inconsistencies |
| Articles of association | Category verification dimensions: whether the governance structure, rules of procedure, and signature page are complete and version-synchronized | Verify the signature page and version number, and confirm that it is the same version as the agreement and application |
| Tool calling node | Whether the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required correspond to the material fields | Run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, and verify toolChoice, functionCall, and the inputs and returns in the call record |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same institution name is written differently in the application and the agreement. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, without field alignment and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The contribution quantity or cooperation term does not match between the two materials. Cause: After the agreement was revised, the application was not updated synchronously, and the versions were not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The signature page lacks a signature or the receipt was not returned. Cause: The material circulation step did not verify the signature and receipt fields, and missing items were not identified and followed up.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, verify the inputs and returns in the call record, confirm whether it follows up or calls according to the introduction, and verify whether the values of toolChoice and functionCall correspond to the material fields.
Business test: Ask a question missing key information and see whether it follows up first before answering.
- Open the tool node introduction field and check whether this description, taken alone, can be understood in terms of its purpose, when it should be used, and what result it returns.
- Open each parameter configuration one by one, verify the parameter introduction and whether required, and run a trial with a question missing that field to see whether it follows up first rather than directly fabricating.