What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the academic journal business cooperation management scenario; the materials include business cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. These materials are submitted by editorial business roles together with legal and finance at quarterly or project milestones, and after entering the knowledge base each takes on a different role: business cooperation agreements provide the cooperating entities, term, and revenue-sharing terms; advertising review forms carry the advertising content, review opinions, and signature fields; distribution cooperation materials record channels, quantities, dates, and receipts. Field characteristics center on agreement number, partner name, advertising item, distribution quantity, signing date, signature, and receipt status. Material versions are often updated multiple times along with negotiation and approval, and the same record may show inconsistencies in name, quantity, or date between the agreement and the review form or distribution materials, or versions may be out of sync, or signatures and receipts may be missing; therefore, upon entering Q&A intake, missing items must first be identified and followed up on, and only then should answers be given based on the materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). "Intake records and the questions to be completed" are then handled by subsequent AI nodes or manual review. Based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required, the model decides whether to call the tool this time; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Business cooperation agreement | Whether the agreement number, partner name, signing date, and signature are consistent with the advertising review form and distribution cooperation materials | Open the tool node description and parameter descriptions, and check whether the required fields correspond to fields that actually exist in the agreement; run a test with a question missing the agreement number to see whether it follows up first |
| Advertising review form | Whether the advertising item name, quantity, review date, and signature field match the business cooperation agreement and distribution cooperation materials | Open each parameter configuration one by one, and check the description and whether it is required; check whether the returned result contains values that do not exist in the materials |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Whether the distribution channel, quantity, date, and receipt are consistent with the business cooperation agreement and advertising review form, and whether the versions are in sync | Check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, and confirm that the tool calling node connector is linked to the target tool; run a test with a question missing the receipt field to see whether it follows up first |
| Tool calling node | Whether the model decides to call based on the tool description and whether parameters are required, rather than answering directly | Check the inputs and returns in the call record, and inspect the toolChoice and functionCall related configurations and the node status |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, or date of the same record do not match between the business cooperation agreement and the advertising review form. Cause: the two materials are filled in by different roles on different versions, without cross-checking.
- Symptom: the version of the distribution cooperation materials is not in sync, and the old channel and quantity are still referenced. Cause: after updating, the knowledge base was not written back, and expired fields were retrieved during tool calling.
- Symptom: the advertising review form lacks a signature or the distribution cooperation materials lack a receipt, yet the model still gives an answer directly. Cause: the required parameters were not guided for follow-up in the prompt, and the model fabricated parameter values.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a test with a question missing required parameters, check the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm whether it follows up or calls according to the description; check toolChoice, functionCall, and the connector status of the tool calling node.
Business test: ask a question missing key information, see whether it follows up before answering, and check whether the answer has a material basis in the business cooperation agreement, advertising review form, and distribution cooperation materials.
- Open the tool node description field, check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own, and check the parameter descriptions and whether they are required.
- Check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that the tool calling node connector is linked to the target tool, and then run a test with a question missing fields.