What this category's data looks like
Student status establishment and changes in primary and secondary schools revolve around three types of materials: student status records, transfer applications, and suspension/resumption materials. Student status records are drafted by the school's student status administrator based on enrollment and registration information, with fields including name, ID document number, class, enrollment date, guardian, and signature field; transfer applications are filled in by the transferring-in or transferring-out party, including the original school, target school, reason for transfer, opinions of both parties, and receipt; suspension/resumption materials include suspension start and end dates, resumption time, medical certificate, and signatures of the homeroom teacher and supervisor. Material sources are enrollment registration, parent submissions, inter-school correspondence, and approval receipts; the update rhythm is centralized establishment at the beginning of the semester and immediate supplementary entry during the semester as changes occur; field characteristics are multi-table mutual verification, long date chains, and signatures and receipts being indispensable. When entering this function, student status records serve as the retrieval base draft, transfer applications and suspension/resumption materials serve as the objects to be drafted and handed over, model channels are responsible for binding relationships, and dialogue and retrieval are responsible for generating drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
The server-side model channel configuration only outputs model binding relationships and channel responses; the material drafts and handover records that can be issued must be continued by dialogue and retrieval. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition; different stages bind different model types. Channel keys only affect whether calls succeed, not whether personnel can read knowledge base materials.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student status record | Fields complete: name, ID document number, class, enrollment date, guardian, and signature field checked item by item; dates and versions consistent | In the model configuration, check the type annotations and channel configuration, compare against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether maxContext and quoteMaxToken satisfy long-record retrieval |
| Transfer application | If the name, quantity, or date of the same record in the two materials do not match, stop it; opinions of both parties and receipt signature complete | Run a retrieval, check the model identifier and quoted text in the response, set toolChoice as needed, record the number of array items separately, and do not check the quote upper limit |
| Suspension/resumption materials | Suspension start and end dates and resumption time are continuous, medical certificate and signatures of the homeroom teacher and supervisor are not missing, and if versions are not synchronized, return it | Run a dialogue, check the model identifier and draft fields in the response, set maxTokens according to material length, and generate the handover record together with the materials |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, class, and date of the same student do not match between the student status record and the transfer application. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, not mutually verified against the same record, and versions were not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: Suspension/resumption materials lack the homeroom teacher's signature or receipt, and the handover record has no acknowledgment. Cause: Material drafting and handover of responsibility are separated, and the acknowledgment step was not filled back.
- Phenomenon: Retrieval reports an indexing model-related error, or the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: The model type bound to the stage is inconsistent with the model name returned by the channel.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check that the model identifier in the response is consistent with the model name returned by the channel, and check that the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice match the stage.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are stopped.
- In the model configuration, check item by item the type annotations of the five model categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and confirm they correspond to the stages to be used.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, compare the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether the signatures and receipts in the handover record are complete.