What this category's data looks like
This category's data revolves around three types of materials for primary and secondary school admissions: the admissions plan, the application materials checklist, and the admission list. The admissions plan contains fields such as admissions scope, time nodes, and admission rules; the application materials checklist contains material names, number of copies, and submission methods; the admission list contains names, ID numbers, admission batches, and dates. These three types of materials circulate repeatedly through the stages of drafting, review, issuance, and handover, and the same record often appears in multiple materials. When materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays its own role of being retrieved and cited: the admissions plan provides the basis for rules, the application materials checklist provides the intake criteria, and the admission list provides the result fields. The update rhythm advances with the admissions season: the plan is set first, the checklist follows, and the list comes last; versions and dates must be synchronized, and signatures and receipts must be complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length can be 0. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the admissions scope, time nodes, admission rules fields and signature column, compare whether the names, quantities, and dates in the two materials are consistent, and check whether the version number and issuance date are synchronized |
| Application materials checklist | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the material names, number of copies, submission methods fields and receipt column, compare whether the same material names, quantities, and dates in the checklist and the plan match, and check for missing signatures or receipts |
| Admission list | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the name, ID number, admission batch, date fields and signature column, compare whether the batches and dates in the list and the plan are consistent, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| Citation content output | The number of returned items matches the hit materials; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the output is empty while the chain continues; open the citation marker in the conversation, compare it with the source document, and record the array length and the quoteMaxToken budget |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and ID number of the same student do not match between the application materials checklist and the admission list. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, and no comparison of names and quantities for the same record was made.
- Phenomenon: The admissions plan has been updated, but the application materials checklist still cites the old version date. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and the version number and issuance date were not checked during handover.
- Phenomenon: The admission list lacks a signature or receipt, and the next step cannot sign for acceptance. Cause: The handover record fields are incomplete, the responsible person is not clear, and missing items were not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask a question with source-text support, and check whether the citation array and markers can point back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through, and record the array length and the quoteMaxToken budget; the two are not compared for equality.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Open the search parameter panel and check item by item, confirming that the values are consistent with those set in the knowledge base retrieval section.
- Open the citation markers in the conversation, compare them with the source document, check whether each citation can point back to the original text paragraph, and view the
responseData(non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) andquoteListfields.