What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on material drafting and responsibility handover in the exam question setting and marking scenario for primary and secondary schools, involving three core types of materials: the question-setting two-way specification table, the exam paper, and the marking rubric. The question-setting two-way specification table comes from the subject question-setting group and is updated by semester or exam cycle; its fields include knowledge point, question type, score, cognitive level, question setter, date, and signature. The exam paper comes from the question review group and is updated by exam batch; its fields include question number, question stem, answer, score, question reviewer, date, and signature. The marking rubric comes from the marking group and is updated by marking standard version; its fields include question number, scoring point, score, marker, date, and signature. When the three types of materials enter the sharing and embedding function, each serves as a signable material draft and handover record, a sharing link is generated by the publishing channel, external visitors see the corresponding content according to their identity, and sign-off and responsibility handover are completed.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the sharing link in the publishing channel (the publishing service performs authentication), outputting the sharing link, display parameters, and authentication results. The "signable material draft and handover record" is then completed by external visitors seeing the corresponding content according to their identity. The sharing link can be configured with expiration time, per-minute access limit, point limit, identity verification, and display items for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Question-setting two-way specification table | Fields are complete, including knowledge point, question type, score, cognitive level, question setter, date, and signature, and the name, quantity, and date are consistent with the exam paper and marking rubric | Check the corresponding fields of the specification table against the exam paper and marking rubric, check whether signatures and receipts are complete, and record the version and date |
| Exam paper | Fields are complete, including question number, question stem, answer, score, question reviewer, date, and signature, and the question numbers and scores are consistent with the specification table and marking rubric | Check the question numbers and scores of the exam paper against the specification table and marking rubric, check the question reviewer's signature and receipt, and record the version and date |
| Marking rubric | Fields are complete, including question number, scoring point, score, marker, date, and signature, and the question numbers and scores are consistent with the specification table and exam paper | Check the question numbers and scores of the marking rubric against the specification table and exam paper, check the marker's signature and receipt, and record the version and date |
| Sharing link | Expiration time, per-minute access limit, point limit, identity verification, and display items for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text are set according to usage needs | Check the time limit and values in the link configuration, access once each with an unauthenticated session and an over-limit request, and check the toggle status of each quoted display item one by one |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the specification table and the exam paper. Cause: Each was filled in separately during the drafting stage, without cross-checking and version synchronization.
- Symptom: The question numbers and scores of the marking rubric and the exam paper are inconsistent, and signatures or receipts are missing at handover. Cause: Versions were not synchronized, and the handover record did not require item-by-item sign-off.
- Symptom: The link cannot be opened after a period of time, or the quoted full text can be seen without logging in. Cause: The expiration time and identity verification were not set according to usage needs, and the toggles of quoted display items were not checked one by one.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: access once each with an unauthenticated session and an over-limit request, check the allow-through and quoted display, and check the link configuration corresponding to shareId.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the expiration time, per-minute access limit, point limit, and identity verification callback address in the link configuration, and try once with an over-limit request.
- Check the toggle status of each quoted display item for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text one by one, access once with an unauthenticated session, and confirm that the quoted display and the file visibility scope are each independent.