What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenarios of school safety hazard inspections and campus incident reporting. Material sources include three types: safety inspection checklists, hazard rectification ledgers, and emergency incident reports. Safety inspection checklists are updated weekly or monthly, with fields including inspection date, location, hazard description, and inspector signature; hazard rectification ledgers are updated on a rolling basis as rectification progresses, with fields including hazard number, rectification measures, responsible person, completion date, and acceptance signature; emergency incident reports are drafted immediately upon occurrence of an incident, with fields including incident name, occurrence time, number of people involved, handling process, and reporter signature. When these three types of materials enter this feature, they respectively assume the roles of prior context basis, rectification basis, and reporting basis: safety inspection checklists provide the source of hazards, hazard rectification ledgers provide the handling process, and emergency incident reports provide the full picture of the incident, enabling the model to carry forward references and constrain the answer scope in multi-turn dialogue, forming signable material drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue are referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Safety inspection checklist | Inspection date, hazard description, and inspector signature are complete, and consistent with the hazard number, name, quantity, and date in the hazard rectification ledger | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, and compare the records associated with messages and chatId |
| Hazard rectification ledger | Rectification measures, responsible person, completion date, and acceptance signature are complete, and match the same record's name, quantity, and date in the safety inspection checklist and emergency incident report | Check whether the version and date are synchronized, check whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked, and record the variables values |
| Emergency incident report | Incident name, occurrence time, number of people involved, handling process, and reporter signature are complete, and consistent with the handling process and date in the hazard rectification ledger | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, see whether missing items are blocked, and compare the usage records of two runs |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same hazard do not match between the safety inspection checklist and the hazard rectification ledger. Cause: The two materials are updated separately, and fields are not checked against the same record.
- Symptom: Material versions are not synchronized, and the handover record still references an old draft. Cause: Update rhythms differ, and versions and dates are not refreshed in sync with rectification.
- Symptom: The hazard rectification ledger lacks an acceptance signature or the emergency incident report lacks a receipt. Cause: The handover step does not list signatures and receipts as prerequisites for issuance.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Use two consecutive follow-up questions, with the second question using a reference to carry forward the first, and see whether the answer carries forward the prior reference; check the memory turns value in the application settings, and confirm the historical message range associated with messages and chatId.
Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and match it with the prior context range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, confirm that the second round correctly carries forward the reference from the first round; compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns.