What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials: program setup application forms, talent cultivation plans, and expert review opinions. Sources are departmental applications, academic affairs consolidation, and expert review records, with update cadence advancing along application batches and adjustment windows. The program setup application form carries the proposed program name, code, degree-granting category, and faculty conditions; the talent cultivation plan carries training objectives, curriculum system, credit structure, and length of study; the expert review opinions carry review conclusions, expert lists, and signature dates. When materials enter the model access and configuration stage, the application form and plan serve as the body basis for drafting and handover, and the review opinions serve as the receipt evidence for responsibility handover; together the three constitute the field sources for signable drafts and handover records. Field characteristics concentrate in four categories: names, quantities, dates, and signatures. The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in two materials must align, and versions and dates must stay synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
Server-side model channel configuration only outputs model binding relationships and channel responses; signable material drafts and handover records must be produced by dialogue and retrieval. Models fall into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and the binding relationships determine which type of model dialogue and retrieval call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup application form | The names, quantities, and dates must be consistent with the talent cultivation plan and expert review opinions, and signature fields must not be blank | Check the program name and code on the application form, compare the program name and length of study in the plan, and check whether expert signatures and dates have complete receipts |
| Talent cultivation plan | The curriculum system, credit structure, and degree category must correspond to the program setup application form, and the version number and date must stay synchronized | Compare the curriculum modules in the plan with the training objectives in the application form, verify the version number and issue date, and confirm no old versions remain |
| Expert review opinions | The review conclusions, expert lists, and signature dates must match the application form and plan; if signatures or receipts are missing, block it | Check the review conclusions item by item against the wording in the two materials, check expert signatures and receipt dates, and confirm the handover record has been signed for |
| Model binding relationships | The five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the stages they are bound to, and model identifiers match document names | Check the type labels in the model configuration, compare against the model names returned by the channel, and check that maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the bound stage |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same program do not match across two materials. Cause: during drafting, the plan was not backfilled based on the application form, and no field comparison was done before handover.
- Symptom: material versions are not synchronized, and an old plan still circulates with a new application form. Cause: the version number and date were not updated with the adjustment, and the handover record did not note the replacement relationship.
- Symptom: expert review opinions lack signatures or receipts, and the material is returned by the next stage. Cause: responsibility handover was not signed off item by item, and signature fields and receipt dates were not checked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm the language model and indexing model binding relationships are correct, and check that maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the stage in use; the quote limit only checks the tokens of the quoted text, and the number of array items is recorded separately.
Business test: draft one set according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the program setup application form, talent cultivation plan, and expert review opinions item by item; if any item is missing, block it and return it for correction.
- Check the model binding relationships and channel responses, confirm the model identifiers match the document names, and check that the configuration of
maxContext,maxTokens, andquoteMaxTokencorresponds to the stage.