What this category's data looks like
The core materials of college admissions physical examination organizations in authorized access and external services include three categories: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications. Physical examination forms are filled out by the examination department and contain name, items, conclusion, date, and physician signature; re-examination applications are submitted by candidates or parents and contain the reason for application, original conclusion, re-examination items, and receipt signature; restricted-major notifications are issued by the admissions department and contain the major name, basis for restriction, notification date, and candidate acknowledgment. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays a different role: the physical examination form is the main basis for determining physical conditions, the re-examination application is the credential for starting the process, and the restricted-major notification is the compliance text for external explanation. The material update rhythm is synchronized with admissions batches, and conclusion changes after re-examination need to be re-archived. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. A common problem is that the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match across different materials, or versions are not synchronized, or signatures and receipts are missing. In external services, the visible scope for parents or superiors should match the visitor's identity, and unauthorized content must not be visible.
Configuration and implementation checks
The citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node only outputs an array of citation content, each containing the original text fragment and source identifier; the length can be 0. The externally available entry point and authorization scope must be handled subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Even if no content is found, the output chain still runs through.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent between the physical examination form and the re-examination application | Open the citation marker to compare with the original text, and verify the name, items, conclusion, date, and physician signature; use responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) to view the number of entries in the citation array, and trace each entry back to the source document |
| Re-examination application | Whether the reason for application, original conclusion, re-examination items, and receipt signature are complete, and whether the version is synchronized with the latest physical examination form | Verify the application date and receipt signature; if the quantity or date of the same record does not match in the two materials, first verify the hit material and then verify the trimming, and use quoteList to view the correspondence between the citation fragment and the original paragraph |
| Restricted-major notification | Whether the major name, basis for restriction, notification date, and candidate acknowledgment are consistent with the physical examination conclusion; if the signature or receipt is missing, it must not be made external | Compare with the source document to verify the major name and basis for restriction; access once with a restricted identity to see whether the visible scope matches the setting, record the number of citations separately, and quoteMaxToken is only used as the content budget |
| External entry point and authorization scope | Whether the visitor's identity matches the visible scope, and whether unauthorized content is not visible | Access once with a restricted identity and verify the visible scope; when the citation array is empty, the chain still runs through, and an empty array is not judged as a retrieval failure |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: The two materials are filled out by different stages, and field comparison and receipt verification were not performed.
- Symptom: The version of the restricted-major notification is not synchronized, and the old version is still externally visible. Cause: After the material was updated, it was not re-archived, and the authorization scope was not adjusted with the version.
- Symptom: The re-examination application lacks a signature or receipt but still enters external services. Cause: The visitor's identity and visible scope were not matched, and unauthorized content was not intercepted.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask a question with an original-text basis, verify whether the citation array and markers can point back to the original text, use responseData to view the number of entries, and use quoteList to view the fragments; then ask a question with no matching material, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and unauthorized content is not visible.
- Verify whether the selected knowledge base uses the same vector model, open the search parameter panel and verify the values item by item, and do not compare the number of citations and
quoteMaxTokenfor equality. - Run a test with a query that has no matching material, confirm that the output is empty while the chain continues; then open the citation markers to compare with the source documents, and verify whether each citation can point back to the original paragraph.