What this category's data looks like
This page addresses material drafting and responsibility handover in undergraduate program revision. The category materials include three types: the program plan, course syllabi, and the credit structure table. The program plan carries the program direction and the overall credit framework, the course syllabi carry course objectives and assessment methods, and the credit structure table carries the credits and proportions of each module. The material sources are the departmental teaching committee, the program director, and the academic affairs office, and the update cadence advances by revision batch, typically with concentrated drafting in the spring semester and finalization before the fall semester. The field characteristics center on course name, course code, credits, class hours, semester offered, revision date, and signature field. When entering this feature, the program plan serves as the main file, and the course syllabi and credit structure table serve as attachments and comparison tables; together the three form a draft that can be issued and a handover record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the application settings (response limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "A draft that can be issued and a handover record" is then completed by the model. The response limit uses a slider to control the length of a single answer; if set too low, the answer will be truncated, and if set too high, consumption will increase. Entry and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; the response limit and context length do not determine access authorization, nor do they generate a business deliverable.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program plan | Course name, course code, credits, revision date, and signature field are complete, and are consistent with the course syllabi and credit structure table | In the application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and check whether maxResponse and maxContext match the long-form drafting requirement |
| Course syllabi | Course objectives, assessment methods, class hours, and semester offered align item by item with the program plan, and the version number and date are synchronized | Check the tokens of the quoted text corresponding to quoteMaxToken; record the number of array entries separately, and do not compare the number of entries with the budget for equality |
| Credit structure table | The credits and proportions of each module and the total credits sum are correct, and the signature or receipt is complete | Compare usage across two runs to confirm the change in single-run usage after the limit adjustment, and check whether the end of a longer answer is complete |
| Handover record | The responsible person, receipt time, version, and date are consistent, and missing items are blocked | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or credits of the same course do not match between two materials. Cause: During drafting, the course syllabi and credit structure table were not updated synchronously based on the program plan.
- Symptom: The revision date and version number are inconsistent between two materials. Cause: The version was not synchronized, an old draft overwrote a new draft, or the attachment was not updated with the main file.
- Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The receipt step was not checked item by item according to the template, and the responsible person field and date field were left blank.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the end is complete, confirm that the response limit matches the answer length required by the page, and check the values of maxResponse and maxContext.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and confirm that the single-answer length matches the drafting task.
- Compare usage across two runs, check the change in single-run usage after the limit adjustment, and confirm that the end of a longer answer is complete.