What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on issuable material drafts and handover records in graduate training process management, covering three types of materials: training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. The training plan is drafted jointly by the supervisor and the graduate student, and includes course credits, research direction, and time schedule; the proposal report includes the basis for topic selection, literature review, research plan, and review comments; the mid-term assessment form includes progress self-assessment, supervisor comments, and assessment conclusion. The material source is the submission and review records of each training stage, and the update rhythm rolls forward with the advancement of semesters and review milestones, with each revision generating a new version. When entering the sharing and embedding function, the training plan serves as the basis for training program confirmation and signature, the proposal report serves as the record of topic argumentation and review, and the mid-term assessment form serves as the basis for process inspection and triage. During handover, all three types of materials require complete fields, clear responsible persons, and consistent versions and dates before they can enter the next stage for acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the sharing link in the publishing channel (the publishing service performs authentication), and outputs the sharing link, display parameters, and authentication results. The issuable material drafts and handover records are completed by external visitors who see the corresponding content according to their identity. The sharing link can be configured with expiration time, per-minute access limit, credit limit, identity verification, and display items for quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Course credits, research direction, and time schedule fields are complete, supervisor and graduate student signatures are complete, and version date is consistent with the proposal report | Check the time limit and identity verification in the link configuration, access once with an unauthenticated session, and verify the display items corresponding to shareId |
| Proposal report | The basis for topic selection, literature review, research plan, and review comments fields are complete, review signatures and receipts are complete, and the name and quantity are consistent with the mid-term assessment form | Check item by item the switch status of quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text, record the number of entries in the quote array, and separately verify the quoted text tokens |
| Mid-term assessment form | Progress self-assessment, supervisor comments, and assessment conclusion fields are complete, assessment signatures and receipts are complete, and the date is synchronized with the training plan version | Check the value of the per-minute access limit, try once with an over-limit request, and confirm that the pass-through and rate limiting meet expectations |
| Handover record | The responsible person is clear, the version and date are consistent, missing items are blocked, and the next-stage acceptor is traceable | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, verify shareId and the authentication result, and confirm that missing items are blocked |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the training plan and the proposal report. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, and no field-level consistency check was performed.
- Symptom: The training plan version referenced by the mid-term assessment form is not synchronized, and the signature page and body version are inconsistent. Cause: After revision, the handover record was not regenerated and the acceptor was not notified.
- Symptom: The link cannot be opened after a period of time, or the quoted full text can be seen without logging in. Cause: The expiration time and identity verification were not set according to usage needs, and the switch status of quoted display items was not checked item by item.
How to verify the setup
This function acceptance: access once each with an unauthenticated session and an over-limit request, and verify the pass-through and quote display; check item by item the expiration time, per-minute access limit, identity verification, and quote display items, and record the result corresponding to shareId.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the expiration time, per-minute access limit, credit limit, and identity verification callback address, and confirm they match the expected access volume.
- Check item by item the switch status of quoted snippets, quoted full text, and source original text, and record the number of entries in the quote array and the quoted text tokens.