What this category's data looks like
For the drafting of materials and handover of responsibility for vocational college program setup filing, three types of materials are involved: the program setup filing form, the talent demand justification, and the faculty and equipment list. The filing form comes from the institution's application basis, is updated by academic year, and its fields include program name, code, program length, enrollment number, and signature; the talent demand justification comes from industry research and regional industry data, is updated by justification cycle, and its fields include job name, demand quantity, research date, and justifier; the faculty and equipment list comes from HR and asset ledgers, is updated by semester, and its fields include teacher name, title, equipment name, quantity, and purchase date. When these three types of materials enter this feature, the filing form serves as the main record, while the justification and list serve as supporting attachments, and their names, quantities, and dates must be aligned item by item with the main record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Material drafts and handover records that can be issued" are then completed by the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Program name, code, program length, enrollment number, signature, and date are complete, and are consistent item by item with the justification and list | In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, use maxResponse to confirm the length of a single answer, then compare the filing form fields |
| Talent demand justification | Job name, demand quantity, research date, and justifier signature are consistent with the filing form basis | Ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete, and check whether the jobs and quantities in the justification match the filing form |
| Faculty and equipment list | Teacher name, title, equipment name, quantity, and purchase date are synchronized with the filing form version | Check whether the equipment quantities and dates in the list are consistent with the filing form, and confirm that the handover receipt has been signed for |
| Context and token | The length of a single answer matches the range of context that can be accommodated and the page requirements, and the number of quotes is recorded separately | Compare usage across two runs, and check whether the budgets of maxContext and quoteMaxToken are filled up by the tokens of the quoted text |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same program name is written differently in the filing form and the justification, and the quantities and dates do not match. Cause: the two materials are maintained separately and have not been aligned item by item.
- Symptom: the faculty and equipment list has been updated, but the filing form is still the old version, and it was not synchronized at handover. Cause: the version was not synchronized, and receipt confirmation is missing.
- Symptom: the material draft has fields but lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage rejects it. Cause: the responsible person is not clearly defined, and the handover record is incomplete.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and check whether the values of maxResponse and maxContext match the answer length required by the page.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and confirm that the length of a single answer matches the page requirements.
- Compare usage across two runs, record the number of quotes and the tokens of the quoted text, and confirm that the
quoteMaxTokenbudget has not been filled up.