What this category's data looks like
Technical college academic education management involves three types of materials: student registration forms, teaching plans, and skills training records. Student registration forms originate from admissions and enrollment information, with updates rolling according to semester registration milestones; teaching plans originate from professional talent training programs, with updates revised by academic year; skills training records originate from practical training courses and assessment processes, with updates advancing weekly or by topic. The field characteristics of the three types of materials center on name, major, class, course name, training project, quantity, start and end dates, signature, and receipt. When materials enter the forms and interaction function, student registration forms assume the role of identity and qualification basis, teaching plans assume the role of course and progress basis, and skills training records assume the role of process and result basis; together, the three support issuable material drafts and handover records. Complete fields, clear responsible persons, and consistent versions and dates are the key points for judgment before handing over to the next stage for acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, outputting the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). Issuable material drafts and handover records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state; after the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete; whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record match between the student registration form and the teaching plan | Check field names one by one in the node configuration, check the required settings, and reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial |
| Teaching plan | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete; whether the version is synchronized; whether the course name and quantity are consistent in the two materials | Check field names one by one in the node configuration, check the required settings, and reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial |
| Skills training record | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete; whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked; whether the training project and quantity match | Check field names one by one in the node configuration, check the required settings, and reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial |
| Form fields and required markers | One-to-one correspondence with the material fields to be collected; key material fields have been marked as required | Check field names and required settings one by one in the node configuration, and after submission check whether subsequent nodes can obtain the corresponding field values |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the student registration form and the teaching plan. Cause: Field names are not one-to-one corresponding, each is filled in separately during drafting, and field comparison is not performed before handover.
- Phenomenon: The teaching plan version is not synchronized, and old-version courses are mixed with new-version training records. Cause: The form does not record the version and date, and after submission subsequent nodes cannot obtain the version field value.
- Phenomenon: Skills training records lack signatures or receipts, and the material draft is returned. Cause: Key fields are not marked as required, submission is possible even when required items are empty, and the handover record is incomplete.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Fill out once and submit, check the field values obtained by subsequent nodes, and confirm that formInputResult and selectResult can be passed to subsequent nodes after submission.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check field names and required settings one by one in the node configuration, and confirm one-to-one correspondence with the fields of the student registration form, teaching plan, and skills training records.
- Reference the
formInputResultandselectResultfields in subsequent nodes and run a trial, and check whether the corresponding field values can be obtained after submission.