What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on material drafting and responsibility handover for enterprise independent skill talent evaluation, involving three types of materials: the enterprise evaluation filing form, evaluation specifications, and the candidate roster. The filing form comes from the filing information submitted by the evaluation entity, the evaluation specifications come from the evaluation plan and assessment standards, and the roster comes from registration and qualification review records. The materials are updated as the evaluation batch progresses, and their field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures: the filing form contains evaluation occupation, level, and institution information; the evaluation specifications contain assessment methods and scoring elements; and the roster contains candidate identity, declared level, and review status. When the materials enter this feature, the filing form and evaluation specifications are used to generate signable material drafts, and the roster is used to generate handover records. Together, the three support responsibility handover and sign-off for the next stage.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and the type labels must be checked in the model configuration.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | The evaluation occupation, level, institution name, and date in the filing form must be consistent with the evaluation specifications and roster, and the signature field must not be empty | Check names, quantities, dates, and signatures item by item against the evaluation specifications and roster, and if any inconsistency is found, roll back and revise |
| Evaluation specifications | The assessment methods, scoring elements, and version date in the specifications must be synchronized with the filing form and roster, and the version number must not be missing | Check whether the version and date are consistent, and confirm that the candidate scope referenced by the specifications matches the roster quantity |
| Candidate roster | The candidate names, declared levels, review statuses, and quantities in the roster must correspond to the filing form and evaluation specifications | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, check whether missing items are blocked, and check whether the receipts are complete |
| Model binding relationships | The five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—must correspond to the stages in which they are used, and the model identifiers must be consistent with the names listed in the documentation | Check the type labels in the model configuration, compare them with the model names returned by the channel, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the stage |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the filing form and the roster. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, fields were not synchronized according to the same version, and item-by-item comparison was missing before handover.
- Symptom: The evaluation specifications have been updated, but the filing form and roster still reference the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the version number and update date were not recorded during material circulation, resulting in inconsistency between the handover records and the drafts.
- Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage cannot sign off. Cause: The responsible person was not specified in the template, and the sign-off step did not verify whether the signature field and receipt fields were complete.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and indexing model binding relationships are correct, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the stage.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the type labels of the five model categories in the model configuration, compare them with the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that the model identifiers are consistent with the names listed in the documentation.
- Draft the filing form, evaluation specifications, and roster drafts according to the template, check names, quantities, dates, and signatures item by item, complete one handover, and check the receipts.