What this category's data looks like
During the filing and implementation stages, enterprise independent skill talent evaluation generates multiple materials: the enterprise evaluation filing form, evaluation specifications, candidate rosters, and accompanying handover records and receipts. These materials come from human resources departments, skill appraisal agencies, and employing units, are updated by batch, and are revised on a rolling basis with policy adjustments and personnel changes. The filing form focuses on unit qualifications, evaluation occupations and levels, and venue and assessor information; the evaluation specifications focus on assessment methods, scoring standards, and qualification conditions; the roster focuses on candidate identity, trade, level, and contact information. When materials enter the form input step, the filing form and evaluation specifications play the basis role, the roster plays the list role, and the handover record plays the circulation role; their respective fields must be matched item by item during drafting to avoid discrepancies in names, quantities, and dates for the same record across different materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are completed by subsequent nodes or manually afterward. After the node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and the workflow state is recorded; after the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete; the unit name and evaluation occupation level can be verified | Check the field names one by one in the node configuration, confirm that required markers cover key items, and reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial |
| Evaluation specifications | Assessment methods, scoring standards, and qualification conditions are consistent with the filing form, and the version date is synchronized | Check the required settings and version date one by one, and after submission check whether the field values obtained by subsequent nodes are consistent with the specifications |
| Candidate roster | Candidate names, trades, levels, and quantities match the filing form and evaluation specifications | Check the roster fields and required markers, reference the formInputResult and selectResult fields in subsequent nodes, and run a trial |
| Handover record | Responsible person, handover date, version, and receipt signature are clear, and missing items are blocked | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and check whether submission is possible when required items are empty |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name or trade does not match across two materials. Cause: during drafting, items were not checked one by one according to the filing form's criteria, and field sources were not unified.
- Symptom: the evaluation specification version was not synchronized, and the old standard is still referenced. Cause: the version and date were not updated with the materials, and the version field was not checked during handover.
- Symptom: the handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next step cannot sign for acceptance. Cause: required markers did not cover the signature and receipt items, so submission was not blocked.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: fill it out once and submit, check the field values obtained by subsequent nodes, and confirm that the formInputResult and selectResult fields can be passed normally.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the field names and required markers one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that key material fields are marked as required.
- Reference the field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, and confirm that after submission the subsequent nodes can obtain the corresponding field values.