Workflow Orchestration for Exam Organization and Misconduct Handling: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Exam Administration: review workflows for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

The materials in the exam organization and violation handling category mainly consist of exam administration manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records. Sources are pre-exam scheduling, invigilator completion, and violation registration; the update cadence rolls with exam batches, and multiple revisions may occur within the same batch. Field characteristics center on candidate name, examination room number, subject, time, violation circumstances, quantity, signature, and receipt. When materials enter workflow orchestration, the exam administration manual serves as the basis for rules and procedures, the examination room record sheet serves as the on-site facts and time anchor, and the violation fact record serves as the handling basis and responsibility pointer; the three must align with one another on name, quantity, date, and version in order to form a signable material draft and handover record.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch direction and interaction state records. The "signable material draft and handover record" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Exam administration manualWhether the fields, dates, and signatures serving as the basis for rules and procedures are completeCheck the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm that the manual clauses correspond one-to-one with the branches
Examination room record sheetWhether the names, quantities, and dates of the on-site facts are consistent with the violation fact recordTrigger once, view the node status in the run record, and reference variables in a subsequent node for a trial run
Violation fact recordWhether the violation circumstances, responsible person, signature, and receipt are completeCheck the branch connection corresponding to nodeId, and confirm that the selection result has been passed to the subsequent node
Handover recordConsistent version and date, clear responsible person, traceable receiptReference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once to see whether it follows the corresponding branch

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the examination room record sheet and the violation fact record. Cause: The two materials are filled out separately, and field comparison and branch confirmation are not performed within the node.
  • Phenomenon: After the exam administration manual is revised, the examination room record sheet and violation fact record still use the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the branch direction was not reselected according to the latest options.
  • Phenomenon: The violation fact record lacks a signature or receipt, and no one signs for it during handover. Cause: The process stops after the interaction is completed, and the selection result variable is not passed to the subsequent node.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this feature: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, and confirm that variables, nodeId, and the option branches correspond one-to-one.

Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.

  • Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
  • Trigger the user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node for a trial run.