What this category's data looks like
This page addresses corporate compliance and safety training scenarios. Materials come from three categories: compliance training courseware, safety operating procedures, and exam records. Courseware is revised according to regulatory updates and annual plans, with fields including course name, applicable position, credit hours, effective date, and preparation and approval signatures; procedures are version-changed when equipment or process changes are triggered, with fields including process name, risk level, operating steps, version number, release date, and training confirmation signature; exam records are generated by session, with fields including exam paper name, participants, score, exam date, invigilator signature, and receipt. When materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, courseware and procedures are cited as drafting bases, and exam records are checked as handover evidence; based on this, the model produces signable material drafts and handover records, while external access and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. Synchronization of the update cadence with version number, date, and signature is the prerequisite for field consistency.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints for reference. The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if it is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the range of prior context required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to observe whether the second question picks up the reference from the first |
| Compliance training courseware | Course name, applicable position, credit hours, effective date, and preparation and approval signatures are complete, and consistent with the name and date in the exam records | Check field by field against the template, verify whether the version number and release date are synchronized, and block if a signature or receipt is missing |
| Safety operating procedures | Process name, risk level, operating steps, version number, release date, and training confirmation signature are complete, and consistent with the version cited by the courseware | Check whether the old version is disabled after a version change, and verify whether the quantity and date in the handover records match |
| Exam records | Exam paper name, participants, score, exam date, invigilator signature, and receipt are complete, and consistent with the names, quantities, and dates in the courseware and procedures | Check signatures and receipts by session, and check whether the fields of the same record are consistent across the two materials |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course name, number of participants, and date of the same record do not match between the courseware and the exam records. Cause: different versions were cited separately during drafting, and no cross-check of fields was performed.
- Symptom: After a procedure version change, the handover records still cite the old version number and old release date. Cause: the version was not synchronized, and the drafting and handover steps each used historical materials.
- Symptom: The material draft has complete fields but lacks a preparation signature or training receipt. Cause: the handover step did not sign off item by item according to the template, and missing items were not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first; at the same time, check the values of messages and variables within the historical range, and confirm that chatId corresponds to the same session.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and compare the usage records of the two runs
- Check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the courseware, procedures, and exam records field by field against the template, and check whether the version number and release date are synchronized