What this category's data looks like
In the scheduling and class-hour deduction scenario of training institutions, materials are mainly of three types: class schedules, class-hour deduction records, and schedule change requests. They come from academic affairs system exports and manual reporting, and their update cadence changes daily with scheduling adjustments, leave make-up classes, and teacher handovers. Field characteristics center on course name, class, teacher, classroom, number of class hours, date and time period, student roster, signature, and receipt. When class schedules enter the model access and configuration stage, they serve as the draft pending issuance; class-hour deduction records serve as the verification evidence for class hours that have occurred; and schedule change requests serve as the basis for changes. Together, the three support material drafting and responsibility handover. Model access and configuration here assumes the responsibility of binding the dialogue and retrieval stages to the correct model types, so that material drafts can obtain consistent fields during generation and retrieval, and handover records can be aligned by version and date.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five types: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and material drafting and responsibility handover depend on the model binding for the dialogue and retrieval stages.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Class schedule | Complete fields: course name, class, teacher, classroom, date and time period, student roster, signature field | Check item by item against the template, verify whether missing items are blocked, and confirm the model identifier in the dialogue and retrieval responses |
| Class-hour deduction record | Date and signature: the class-hour deduction date matches the class schedule date, the quantity matches the number of class hours, and there is a responsible person's signature or receipt | Check whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent between the class schedule and the class-hour deduction record, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| Schedule change request | Version and date consistency: the request version corresponds to the current class schedule version, and the schedule change date does not conflict with the effective date | Check the field correspondence between the schedule change request and the class schedule and class-hour deduction record, and confirm that signatures and receipts are complete |
| Model binding relationship | Model type corresponds to the stage to be used: language model for dialogue, indexing model for retrieval | Check the type labels in the model configuration, compare them with the model names returned by the channel, and check the configuration items maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course name and number of class hours for the same class do not match between the class schedule and the class-hour deduction record. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately and were not checked against the same field template.
- Symptom: The schedule change request has been updated, but the class schedule is still the old version, and the date and signature field are inconsistent. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and the handover record was not refreshed with the change.
- Symptom: The class-hour deduction record lacks the responsible person's signature or receipt, so the handover cannot be signed off. Cause: When the materials were drafted, signatures and receipts were not listed as required fields.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run one dialogue and one retrieval, and check that the model identifier in the response matches the type labeled in the model configuration.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check the type labels for the language model, indexing model, reranking model, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and confirm that they correspond to the stages to be used.
- Check the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether the channel and key source are consistent with the connected service.