What this category's data looks like
The material drafting and responsibility handover for self-funded study abroad application services revolve around three types of materials: study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. The contract includes the scope of services, fees, refunds, and a signature page; the application form includes institution, major, intake term, fields, and dates; the personal statement includes version, word count, and signature. The materials originate from consultant drafting, student confirmation, and copy revision, with an update cadence that rolls with application rounds and deadlines. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, the contract serves as the basis for responsibility boundaries, the application form serves as the working draft for field verification, and the personal statement serves as the object for version and signature; together, the three support issuable material drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | Fields are complete, responsible parties are clear, version and date are consistent; the signature page and receipt are indispensable | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, use chatId to locate the session, and inspect whether the contract fields and signature receipt in messages are correctly carried over from prior context |
| School application form | If the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across the two materials, it is a missing item | Run a trial with two consecutive questions, use a referring follow-up in the second question to ask about application form fields, and see whether variables bring out the date and signature items according to the template |
| Personal statement | If the version is not synchronized, the signature is missing, or the word count does not match the template, it is a missing item | Compare the usage records of two runs and check whether the personal statement version and date in messages are consistent with the contract |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: The two dialogue turns each draft separately, and the prior context range does not cover the other material.
- Phenomenon: The personal statement version is not synchronized, and the handover record still points to the old draft. Cause: The memory turns value is too small, so the revision round is not referenced by later context.
- Phenomenon: The contract lacks a signature or receipt, but the material is still treated as issuable. Cause: The prompt does not constrain the signature item, and the model does not block missing items according to the template.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries over the reference from the first; use chatId and messages to verify the historical message range, and use variables to verify the answer constraints.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and match it with the prior context range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, compare the usage records of the two runs, and confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the turns.