Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Foreign Teacher Recruitment and Course Scheduling: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Foreign Teachers: review conversation for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

Foreign teacher appointment and course scheduling involves three core types of materials: appointment contracts, work permit materials, and course schedules. Appointment contracts contain position, compensation, appointment term, and signature page; work permit materials contain degree, no criminal record, medical examination, dates, and acceptance receipt; course schedules contain course name, week number, classroom, instructor, and number of class hours. The source of materials is the school's human resources and foreign affairs departments, and the update rhythm changes with appointment terms, semesters, and permit approvals. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt stage, each has a different role: appointment contracts provide the responsible party and appointment term boundaries, work permit materials provide compliance fields and the date chain, and course schedules provide the correspondence between teaching tasks and class hours. Material drafting and responsibility handover need to ensure complete fields, clear responsible persons, and consistent versions and dates, and be handed over to the next stage for receipt.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The model then completes the draftable materials and handover records. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Appointment contractWhether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the work permit materials and course scheduleCheck the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second round can correctly carry forward the references from the first round, and compare the name, appointment term, and position title in the contract and permit materials
Work permit materialsWhether the names, quantities, and dates match the appointment contract and course scheduleRun a trial with two consecutive questions: the first question lists the permit material fields, and the second question uses references to ask about missing items; check whether the acceptance receipt and signature page are complete, and check whether the preceding text in messages is correctly referenced
Course scheduleWhether the course name, week number, and class hours are consistent with the appointment contract and work permit materialsCheck the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and in the second question use references to ask about the correspondence between courses and instructors; check whether chatId and variables remain the same record in the dialogue
Handover recordWhether the responsible person, version, and date are clear, and whether the receipt is completeDraft one according to the template and complete one handover, check whether missing items are blocked; check whether the version numbers and dates of the handover record, contract, permit materials, and course schedule are synchronized

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The name and appointment term dates for the same record do not match between the appointment contract and work permit materials. Cause: When drafting materials, the fields were not checked against the same template, and the versions were not synchronized.
  • Phenomenon: The course name and class hours in the course schedule and appointment contract are inconsistent. Cause: After course adjustments, only one material was changed, and the other was not updated.
  • Phenomenon: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage cannot sign for receipt. Cause: The responsible person did not check the signature page and receipt fields item by item during handover.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this function: With two consecutive follow-up questions, the first question lists the appointment contract fields, and the second question uses references to ask about the work permit materials for the same record. See whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question; check whether the preceding text range in messages and chatId are consistent.

Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked; check whether the version and date recorded in variables are consistent with the contract, permit materials, and course schedule.

  • Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second round can correctly carry forward the references from the first round.
  • Draft an appointment contract and course schedule according to the template, complete one handover, check whether missing items are blocked, and compare the names, quantities, dates, and signatures in the two materials.