Citations and Source Traceability for College Entrance Exam Application Eligibility: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Entrance Exam Eligibility: review citations for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

The data in this category looks like this: The drafting of materials and responsibility handover for general college entrance examination registration qualification review revolve around three types of materials: the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrating parents. The college entrance examination registration form carries the candidate's basic information, examination category, and signature confirmation, and is the main record for qualification review; household registration and student status certificates carry the household registration address, the school where the student status is located, and the start and end dates of attendance, and are used to compare the information filled in on the registration form; materials for children accompanying migrating parents carry residence permits, social insurance payment records, and parents' employment information, with many fields, many attachments, and a large date span. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each serves as a retrievable original source, and the node is only responsible for returning the hit original text fragments and source identifiers as an array, not for judging whether the fields are complete. The material update rhythm is affected by registration batches, household registration migration, and student status changes. For the same candidate, the name characters, ID number, attendance dates, and certificate numbers in different materials are prone to inconsistency. Version desynchronization, missing signatures, and missing receipts are also common problems. Therefore, in the drafting and handover stages, the source must be clearly traced back to facilitate subsequent comparison and receipt confirmation.

Configuration and implementation checks

Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length can be 0. The issuable material drafts and handover records are completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.

ObjectCheckVerification action
College entrance examination registration formFields are complete: candidate name, ID number, examination category, contact phone number, signature, and date are visible item by item; the name characters and attendance dates of the same record in the registration form and household registration and student status certificates should be consistentIn the citation array, trace back item by item to the original paragraphs of the registration form, and check the signature and date fields; use responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) to view the returned structure and confirm that the number of citations corresponds to the hit materials
Household registration and student status certificatesFields are complete: household registration address, school where the student status is located, start and end dates of attendance, certificate number, and issue date; compare item by item with the information filled in on the registration form, and dates must not contradict each otherOpen the citation superscript to compare with the source document, and check the certificate number and issue date; use quoteList to view the details of a single citation and confirm that the fragment is consistent with the original text
Materials for children accompanying migrating parentsFields are complete: residence permit number and validity period, start and end of social insurance payments, parents' employment information, receipt, and signature; the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials should be consistentTrace back item by item to the original text of the materials for children accompanying migrating parents, and check the validity period and receipt signature; when the citation upper limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text, and record the number of array items separately, without making an equality comparison with quoteMaxToken
Responsibility handover recordResponsible persons are clear, and version and date are consistent: drafter, reviewer, recipient, handover date, and material version number are complete; missing signatures or receipts should be blockedDraft one according to the template and complete one handover, and check the receipt fields; use responseData to confirm that the citation chain is complete, and missing items are blocked by subsequent nodes or manual work

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The name characters or attendance dates of the same candidate do not match between the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, the original text was not traced back for item-by-item comparison during drafting, and field consistency was not checked before handover.
  • Phenomenon: The version of the materials for children accompanying migrating parents is not synchronized, and an old version of a residence permit or social insurance record is cited as the current material. Cause: After the material was updated, it was not re-entered into the knowledge base or the version number and date were not marked in the handover record, so the citation still points to the old paragraph.
  • Phenomenon: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage cannot confirm receipt. Cause: The handover was initiated before the template fields were fully filled in, or the receipt stage was not filled back, making it impossible to trace the responsible person and date.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this function: ask a question with an original text basis, check whether the citation array and superscript can trace back to the original text, and use quoteList to view the details of a single citation; then ask a question with no matching material, confirm that the array is empty while the chain is complete, record the number of citations according to the array length, and check the tokens of the cited text separately.

Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.

  • In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models, and confirm that the selected knowledge bases use the same vector model.
  • Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item. When the citation upper limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text, and record the number of array items separately, without making an equality comparison with quoteMaxToken.

References