What this category's data looks like
In the enrollment filing stage of general higher education institution admissions, materials center on three core categories: enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters. They originate from provincial admissions and examination institutions and higher education institution admissions offices, and are updated daily as batches progress. Enrollment plans include institution-major groups, planned numbers, and selected examination subjects; filing rules include filing ratios, tie-breaking sorting, and adjustment scope; admission rosters include candidate numbers, names, scores, majors, and admission status. When entering the form input node, each of the three material categories assumes a field-supply role: plans and rules provide filing-basis fields, while rosters provide result fields, jointly supporting signable material drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, outputting the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). Signable material drafts and handover records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually afterward. The form only collects fields; it does not automatically identify material content, nor does it determine the authenticity of materials.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | Institution-major groups, planned numbers, selected examination subjects, dates, and signatures are complete, and consistent with the filing rules' standards | Check field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that the plan fields match the names, quantities, and dates in the roster |
| Filing rules | Filing ratios, tie-breaking sorting, and adjustment scope have been entered, and version and date are synchronized | Check required settings one by one, confirm that rule fields are marked as required, and reference the field in a subsequent node for a trial run |
| Admission roster | Candidate numbers, names, scores, majors, and admission status are consistent with the plan records, and signatures and receipts are not missing | Reference roster fields in a subsequent node and run a trial, confirming that after submission the subsequent node can retrieve the corresponding field values |
| Handover record | Responsible persons are clear, version and date are consistent, and receipts are complete | Check whether the handover record fields are complete, and confirm that missing items are blocked by required-field markings |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the plan and the roster. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, and the fields were not checked against the same standards.
- Symptom: The rule version was not synchronized, and the old filing ratio is still being referenced. Cause: The version and date were not updated with the batch, and the version number was not checked during handover.
- Symptom: The roster lacks signatures or receipts, so the material cannot be issued. Cause: During handover, signatures and receipts were not set as required items, so missing items were not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Fill out the form once and submit it, then check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, confirming that after formInput submission the fields can be referenced, and that userSelect selection items are passed in with the form.
Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check field names one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that they correspond one-to-one with the fields of the enrollment plan, filing rules, and admission roster.
- Check required settings one by one, confirm that key material fields are marked as required, and that submission is not possible when required items are empty; reference the field in a subsequent node and run a trial.