What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on three types of materials in graduate training process management: training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. The training plan is drafted jointly by the supervisor and the graduate student, with fields including course credits, research direction, time nodes, and signatures of both parties; the proposal report is written by the graduate student and reviewed by the supervisor, with fields including title, literature review, work plan, and review opinion signature; the mid-term assessment form is filled out by the assessment panel, with fields including progress, achievements, problems, and panel signatures. In scheduled tasks and automation processes, these materials play the roles of source files, comparison benchmarks, and receipt vouchers, respectively. The update rhythm advances by semester and training stage; old versions must be retained for traceability, and the current version must be unique. When materials enter the function, the training plan serves as the benchmark field source, the proposal report and mid-term assessment form serve as objects to be compared and to be receipted, and reference synchronization depends on the version ledger and change records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by trigger configuration and tool nodes (scheduling capability is not in the tool introduction), outputting trigger records and execution results. The version ledger and change records are completed by business processing according to records or by supplementary runs.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the current version | Verify course credits, research direction, time nodes, and signatures of both parties; compare the version number and reference location |
| Proposal report | Whether the name, quantity, and date match the training plan, and whether signatures are complete | Verify the title, literature review, work plan, and review opinion signature; check the receipt and version synchronization |
| Mid-term assessment form | Whether progress, achievements, and problems are consistent with the proposal report, and whether panel signatures are complete | Verify the assessment panel signatures and receipt; confirm that the old version is traceable and references are synchronized |
| Trigger records and execution results | Whether it executes at the scheduled time and only once | Check the process connections and trigger records; verify the introduction fields and the position of the termination node |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the training plan and the proposal report. Cause: The field sources are not unified, versions are not synchronized, and references are not updated with the content.
- Symptom: The mid-term assessment form lacks panel signatures or a receipt. Cause: The signature step is not included in the scheduled task trigger records, and supplementary runs do not cover the receipt node.
- Symptom: It does not execute at the scheduled time, or after execution it is summarized again by the model. Cause: The trigger is not connected to the corresponding tool node, and the termination node is not connected at the end of the tool.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: check the trigger records and execution time, and confirm that it executes at the scheduled time and only once; verify the introduction fields and the position of the termination node, and check the process connections.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously; confirm that the current version is unique, the old version is traceable, and references are synchronized.
- Check the trigger records and process connections, and confirm that the trigger is connected to the corresponding tool node and that the termination node is connected at the end of the tool.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the training plan, proposal report, and mid-term assessment form, and check whether the version number and reference location are synchronized.