Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for College Admissions Health Examination Organization: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Admissions Health Exams: review conversation for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

The organization of college admissions physical examinations involves three types of materials: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and notices of restricted majors. Fields include candidate name, ID number, physical examination conclusion, restricted major name, re-examination items, signature field, and receipt date. The material sources are the original records of the physical examination station, the review opinions of the admissions office, and the re-examination requests submitted by candidates. The update rhythm advances by batch: initial examination summary, re-examination acceptance, conclusion notification, and handover receipt. When entering this function, the physical examination form assumes the role of basic facts, the re-examination application assumes the role of change request, and the notice of restricted majors assumes the role of result delivery. The name, quantity, and date of the same record in the three materials must be consistent, and neither version nor signature may be missing. Material drafts and handover records must have complete fields, clear responsible persons, and synchronized versions and dates before they can be handed over to the next stage for receipt.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Physical examination formThe fields include candidate name, ID number, physical examination conclusion, signature, and date, and are consistent with the name, quantity, and date in the re-examination application and the notice of restricted majorsCheck the memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and check whether the messages corresponding to chatId bring in the correct preceding text
Re-examination applicationThe re-examination items, application date, signature, and receipt are complete, and the version is synchronized with the physical examination formCompare the usage records of two runs, confirm that the re-examination items in variables are consistent with the physical examination form, and intercept when the signature or receipt is missing
Notice of restricted majorsThe restricted major name, notification date, candidate signature, and receipt are complete, and correspond to the conclusion of the physical examination formRun a trial with two consecutive question turns; when the second turn refers to the restricted major, it can correctly carry forward the first turn, and check whether the messages range matches

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The restricted major name and quantity for the same candidate do not match between the physical examination form and the notice of restricted majors. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, and the fields were not checked against the same record.
  • Phenomenon: The version of the re-examination application is not synchronized, and the signature or receipt is missing. Cause: The version and date were not checked during handover, and missing items were not intercepted.
  • Phenomenon: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, and the response becomes slower and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turn count is too large and brings in irrelevant content, or the opening message is treated as preceding text.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this function: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and check the historical range and answer constraints corresponding to the three identifiers chatId, messages, and variables.

Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are intercepted.

  • Check the current value of the memory turn count in the application settings, and match it with the preceding text range required by the question.
  • Compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that the consumption change after adjusting the turn count is within expectations.