Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Teacher Qualification Exams and Certification: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Teacher Qualifications: review conversation for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

In the teacher qualification examination and certification scenario, materials center on written and interview registration forms, Mandarin proficiency certificates, and medical examination forms, supplemented by identity and academic qualification proof. Registration form fields include name, ID number, examination district, subject, date, and signature; Mandarin proficiency certificate fields include grade, certificate number, and issue date; medical examination form fields include examination conclusion, hospital seal, and date. Sources are candidate submissions and institution-issued documents, and the update cadence rolls with registration batches, medical examination cycles, and certification windows. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, the registration form serves as the information backbone, the Mandarin proficiency certificate and medical examination form serve as supporting attachments, and the handover record links the responsible persons at each stage. The fields of the three are cross-checked, and names, quantities, dates, and signatures must be consistent; versions are synchronized with modifications, missing items are intercepted by prompt constraints, forming a signable draft and handover receipt.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The signable material draft and handover record are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns are referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Written and interview registration formFields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistentAfter drafting according to the template, check the name, ID number, examination district, subject, date, and signature, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the prior references in messages are correctly carried forward
Mandarin proficiency certificateCertificate number, grade, and issue date consistent with the registration form recordVerify item by item against the registration form, confirm there are no discrepancies in names, quantities, or dates; when the version is not synchronized, take the latest issued document as authoritative, and record the receipt
Medical examination formExamination conclusion, hospital seal, and date match the handover recordCheck whether the seal and date are complete; intercept when a signature or receipt is missing, and write chatId and variables into the handover record for traceability
Handover recordResponsible person, version, date, and receipt status clearComplete one handover, confirm receipt by the next stage, ensure missing items are stopped by prompt constraints, and check the run consumption record

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: the same candidate's name is written differently on the registration form and the Mandarin proficiency certificate. Cause: the field source was not unified at entry, the two materials were maintained separately, and cross-checking was lacking.
  • Phenomenon: the date on the medical examination form does not match the date on the handover record. Cause: the version was not synchronized, and related materials were not updated after modification, resulting in inconsistent dates for the same record.
  • Phenomenon: the handover record lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: prompt constraints did not stop the missing item, the responsible person was not clear, and the next stage could not sign for receipt.

How to verify the setup

Feature acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first; check whether the referenced historical message range and answer constraints in messages match the prior context range required by the question.

Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are stopped; compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns.

  • In the application settings, check the current value of memory turns, match it with the prior context range required by the question, and run a trial with two consecutive questions.
  • Draft one copy of the materials according to the template and complete one handover, check that fields are complete, the responsible person is clear, and the version and date are consistent, and record the receipt after missing items are stopped.