What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the signing stage of research project task statements, covering three types of materials: project task statements, topic task breakdown tables, and budget books. The project task statement defines objectives and milestones, the task breakdown table splits topics and responsible persons, and the budget book lists subjects and amounts; the fields of all three must be cross-aligned. Materials are updated along with review comments, budget adjustments, and topic splits, and versions and dates must be refreshed in sync. When entering the model access and configuration function, the task statement and breakdown table serve as the corpus sources for dialogue and retrieval, while the budget book provides amount fields for retrieval comparison; the model binding relationship determines which type of model reads these materials and generates drafts. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts, and any inconsistency will be exposed at handover sign-off.
Configuration and implementation checks
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Project Task Statement | Align item by item with the names, quantities, dates, and signatures in the Project Task Breakdown Table and Budget Statement | Check the same record against the two documents for names, quantities, and dates, and verify that version numbers, signature fields, and receipts are complete |
| Project Task Breakdown Table | The project name, responsible person, and start/end dates are consistent with the task statement | Check the project name, responsible person, and dates in the breakdown table and task statement, and confirm that versions are synchronized and no signatures are missing |
| Budget Statement | The categories, amounts, and dates correspond to the task statement and breakdown table | Check the correspondence between budget categories and task statement items and breakdown table projects, and inspect dates and signed receipts |
| Model Binding Relationships | The five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the stages in which they are used | In the model configuration, check the type labels, channel and key sources, and model identifiers against the model names returned by the channels |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same topic name is written differently in the task statement and the breakdown table. Cause: field conventions were not unified during drafting, and names and quantities were not checked item by item before handover.
- Symptom: the budget book dates do not match the task statement milestones. Cause: versions were not synchronized; after modification only one material was updated while the other still retained the old dates.
- Symptom: missing signatures or receipts are discovered at the sign-off stage. Cause: handover records did not flow together with the materials, and responsible persons did not confirm the signature field before issuance.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, verify that the model identifier in the response matches the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken in the model configuration match the stages in use; for the quote limit, look at the tokens of the quoted text, and record the array count separately.
Business test: draft one document according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, verify the type labels, channel and key sources, and model identifiers of the five model types, and confirm the binding relationship against the model names returned by the channel.
- Check names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts item by item against the project task statement, topic task breakdown table, and budget book, and after confirming the versions are consistent, hand them to the next stage for sign-off.