What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on drafting materials and handover of responsibility in the context of journal publication licenses and annual verification. The materials include three types: journal publication license, annual verification form, and rectification report; the sources are the issuing documents from the licensing authority, the annual submission drafts, and the rectification receipts. The update cadence advances according to the annual verification cycle and rectification deadlines, and the field characteristics center on journal name, journal number, competent and sponsoring units, publication date, verification year, rectification items, and signature fields. When entering the knowledge base retrieval node, the license serves as the basis for subject qualification and licensed scope, the annual verification form serves as the basis for periodic data and verification conclusions, and the rectification report serves as the basis for problem items and closed-loop evidence. Together, the three support a signable material draft and handover record; only when the fields are complete, the responsible persons are clear, and the version and date are consistent can it be handed to the next stage for receipt.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length may be 0. The "signable material draft and handover record" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publication license | Fields include journal name, journal number, competent and sponsoring units, license date, and signature; the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the annual verification form and rectification report must be consistent | In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models; open the citation markers to compare against the original paragraphs of the license, and compare the name, date, and signature fields item by item |
| Annual verification form | Fields include verification year, publication date, verification conclusion, and signature; the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the license and rectification report must be consistent | Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item; run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the cited content array is empty while the chain still runs through |
| Rectification report | Fields include rectification items, rectification deadline, receipt, and signature; the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the license and annual verification form must be consistent | In the conversation, open the citation markers and compare against the source documents; record the number of citations and the quoteMaxToken budget, and do not compare the two for equality |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the license and annual verification form do not match. Cause: the materials on the two sides were drafted separately, without item-by-item reference back to the original text for verification according to a unified field table.
- Symptom: the rectification report version was not synchronized, and the handover record still cites the old draft. Cause: the version and date were not registered together with the material update, and the version number and issue date were not checked at handover.
- Symptom: the materials lack a signature or receipt, and the handover is returned. Cause: the signature field and receipt were not included in the field completeness determination, and missing items were not checked item by item against the template before handover.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask a question with original-text support, check whether the cited content array and citation markers can refer back to the original paragraphs, and record the number of citations and the quoteMaxToken budget; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through, and that quoteList in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) can be checked.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models, and confirm that the selected knowledge bases use the same vector model.
- Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item, keeping them consistent with the values set in the knowledge base retrieval section.