What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on material drafting and responsibility handover in academic journal business cooperation management, covering three categories: business cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. Business cooperation agreements originate from negotiation drafts between the journal's business department and partners, with fields including cooperation entity, business scope, revenue-sharing ratio, signing date, and signatures of both parties; advertising review forms come from the advertising business process, with fields including advertisement name, issue period, number of pages, review opinion, and reviewer signature; distribution cooperation materials are generated from distribution channel coordination, with fields including channel name, distribution quantity, settlement cycle, and receipt. The update rhythm of the three types of materials rolls with the cooperation cycle and issue period. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, each plays a different role: business cooperation agreements provide entity and revenue-sharing fields, advertising review forms provide review and issue period fields, and distribution cooperation materials provide quantity and receipt fields, together forming a signable material draft and handover record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The signable material draft and handover record are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used; if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Business cooperation agreement | Cooperation entity, business scope, revenue-sharing ratio, signing date, and signatures of both parties are complete; the name and quantity are consistent in the two materials | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, check whether the second question inherits the entity reference of the first question, and compare the number of historical entries in messages |
| Advertising review form | Advertisement name, issue period, number of pages, review opinion, and reviewer signature are complete; version and date are synchronized | Use chatId to locate the same session, check whether the advertisement name, number of pages, and date in the review form and the agreement match, and block if a signature or receipt is missing |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Channel name, distribution quantity, settlement cycle, and receipt are complete; issuance is not allowed when the version is not synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs, check whether the distribution quantity in variables is consistent with the agreement record, and mark the missing item when the receipt is absent |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The advertisement name and number of pages of the same record do not match between the business cooperation agreement and the advertising review form. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately and were not checked against unified fields.
- Phenomenon: The version of the distribution cooperation materials is not synchronized, and the old quantity is still referenced. Cause: The version and date were not checked during handover, and the receipt was not returned.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, responses become slower, and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns value is too large and brings in irrelevant content, or the opening message is treated as preceding text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference of the first question, and check whether chatId, messages, and variables change with the number of turns.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and match it with the preceding text range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive interrogative sentences, compare the usage records of the two runs, and confirm that usage changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns.