What this category's data looks like
Academic journal business cooperation management involves three types of materials: business cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. Business cooperation agreements come from cooperation negotiations and legal review, with fields including partner name, scope of cooperation, fee terms, signing date, and signatures of both parties; advertising review forms come from the advertising business department, with fields including advertiser name, advertising content summary, review conclusion, review date, and reviewer signature; distribution cooperation materials come from distribution channel coordination, with fields including channel name, distribution quantity, distribution cycle, handover date, and recipient. The update rhythm of the three types of materials advances with the cooperation cycle and approval process, and versions and dates need to stay synchronized. When materials enter the form input node, each serves as the entry point for field collection and responsibility handover, providing structured data for subsequent drafting and signing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, outputting the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Business cooperation agreement | Whether the partner name, scope of cooperation, fee terms, signing date, and signatures of both parties are complete, and whether the name and date are consistent across the two materials | Check the field names and required markers one by one in the node configuration, and after submission check whether subsequent nodes can retrieve the corresponding field values |
| Advertising review form | Whether the advertiser name, advertising content summary, review conclusion, review date, and reviewer signature are complete, and whether the version is synchronized | Check the required settings one by one, reference this field in subsequent nodes and run a test, and confirm that the field values are passed correctly |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Whether the channel name, distribution quantity, distribution cycle, handover date, and recipient receipt are complete, and whether the quantity and date match | Check the field names in the node configuration, and after submission check whether the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes are complete |
| Form input node | Whether it can be submitted when required items are empty, whether the conversation stays in the interaction state after submission, and whether subsequent nodes can retrieve the field values | Fill it out once and submit, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, and confirm that the formInputResult and selectResult fields are passed normally |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the business cooperation agreement and the advertising review form. Cause: The fields were not checked uniformly, and the two materials were filled in independently.
- Symptom: The version of the distribution cooperation materials is not synchronized, and the handover record is inconsistent with the draft content. Cause: The version and date were not aligned before submission, and subsequent nodes retrieved old values.
- Symptom: The advertising review form lacks a signature or receipt, and the material cannot enter the next signing stage. Cause: The required markers did not cover the signature and receipt fields, so submission was not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: fill it out once and submit, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, confirm that the formInputResult and selectResult fields are passed normally, and that submission is blocked when required items are empty.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the field names and required markers one by one in the node configuration to ensure they correspond one-to-one with the material fields to be collected.
- Reference this field in subsequent nodes and run a test to confirm that after submission the subsequent nodes can retrieve the corresponding field values.