What this category's data looks like
This page addresses data versions and change maintenance for kindergarten game activity organization. Materials include observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity goals, and reflection-to-next-week plans. Observation records correspond to area plans, material placement quantities are updated weekly, activity goal achievement is adjusted along with observation records, and reflection-to-next-week plans must be completed before the weekend. When these materials enter the HTTP interface and external systems, observation records and area plans serve as request body fields, material placement quantities serve as path parameters, and activity goals and reflection-to-next-week plans serve as return fields after request header authentication. The update rhythm is daily recording, weekly aggregation, and monthly archiving. Field characteristics include version number, change time, and reference source. A unique current version, traceable old versions, and synchronized references are the maintenance goals. Changing one piece of content requires checking whether the version number and references are updated in sync.
Configuration and implementation checks
A. This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and return fields. The "version ledger and change records" are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by the external system according to the agreement to complete the next step.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records and area plans | The correspondence between the two must be reflected in the request body, and the field values come from the output of preceding nodes | In the request preview, check whether the variables placeholders are parsed into the actual values of observation records and area plans |
| Material placement quantities | The quantities must be consistent with the external system agreement and must be passable through path parameters | Check whether the path parameter placeholders in the request URL come from the material placement list, and compare the quantities in the return fields |
| Activity goals and reflection-to-next-week plans | Goal achievement and reflection-to-plan must be traceable in the return fields, and authentication information must be passed in according to the external system requirements | Check the source of the request header Authorization value, and inspect the goal and reflection fields in the response body responseData |
Three common errors
- Symptom: Material placement quantities are inconsistent with the external system records. Cause: The request body fields were not updated according to the agreement, or the path parameter placeholders were parsed into old values, resulting in insufficient materials.
- Symptom: Activity goals do not match the observation records. Cause: After the observation records were updated, the goal fields in the request body were not modified in sync, so the references were not synchronized.
- Symptom: The reflection-to-next-week plan was not updated. Cause: The plan fields still reference the old version of the observation records, the version number has not changed, old versions are traceable, but the current version is not unique.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and return fields, then compare the results against one sample.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated in sync.
- In the variables panel, check the source of each placeholder and confirm whether it comes from a global variable, system variable, or the output of a preceding node.
- Use one sample request to compare the return fields and check whether
Authorization,variables, andresponseDataappear according to the agreement.