What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity goals, and reflection-to-next-week plans, among other category materials. These materials originate from daily classroom caregiving and educational practice, and their update cadence typically advances weekly or by thematic activity cycle. When the materials enter the conversation log and auditing feature, each plays a different role: observation records and area plans serve as reference evidence, material placement quantities serve as verification clues, activity goal attainment serves as the judgment baseline, and reflection-to-next-week plans serve as the trigger point for version changes. In terms of field characteristics, attention must be paid to the total record count, role distinction, reference information, and time fields, so that old versions can be traced and references synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the conversation record interface (by application and session dimension), which outputs the session message list and the total record count, including role and reference information. The "version ledger and change records" are then completed manually or by an external system.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records and area plans | Whether the correspondence between the two is consistent, and whether goals and observations match | Pull records by application and session dimension, check the role field and reference information, and compare plan entries with observation content |
| Material placement quantities | Whether the material quantities meet the needs of activity goals and area plans | Check the reference information and time in the records, compare against the material list, and verify whether quantities are insufficient |
| Reflection-to-next-week plans | Whether the plan is updated, whether the old version is traceable, and whether references are synchronized | Page through to retrieve all records, check chatId and dataId, and confirm that the version number and references are updated in sync |
Three common errors
- Symptom: material placement quantities do not match the area plan, making activity goals hard to achieve. Cause: the plan was not updated along with observation records, and material replenishment lagged behind activity progress.
- Symptom: observation records are inconsistent with activity goals, and the reflection-to-next-week plan lacks a basis. Cause: records were not promptly entered into the version ledger, and old and current versions were mixed.
- Symptom: reference information is missing or old versions cannot be traced, and external documents and the knowledge base are out of sync. Cause: only the first page was retrieved, the total record count was not checked, and
valuewas not expanded.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: page through by total record count to retrieve all records, sample one record to check the role, reference information, and time, confirm that response code of 200 matches the total record count total, and check _id, dataId and value.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated in sync.
- Pull two pages in a row and compare the offset and total record count, confirming that the two role types, question and answer, appear alternately.
- Open a single record to check the reference and elapsed-time fields; if a reference upper limit is involved, check the tokens of the reference text, and record the array item count separately.