What this category's data looks like
Student status establishment and transfers in primary and secondary schools involve three core types of materials: student status records, transfer applications, and suspension/resumption materials. Student status records contain students' basic information, family information, enrollment and graduation dates, and homeroom teacher signatures; transfer applications contain the names of the transferring-out and transferring-in schools, application dates, seals from both parties, and receipts; suspension/resumption materials contain the start and end dates of suspension, resumption certificates, and signatures from the school doctor and the supervising leader. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays a different role: student status records provide the field baseline, transfer applications provide the transfer trajectory, and suspension/resumption materials provide evidence of status changes. In terms of update cadence, student status establishment is concentrated in fall enrollment, transfers occur on a rolling basis with the semester, and material versions need to be archived by semester. Field characteristics manifest as the same student name, class, and date appearing repeatedly across multiple materials, while signatures and receipts are key to completeness judgments. The version ledger needs to record the current version number, effective date, and replacement relationship of each material to ensure that old versions are traceable and citations are synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing an original text snippet and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The "version ledger and change records" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student status record | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and whether the name and class are consistent in the transfer application and suspension/resumption materials | Open the citation marker to compare against the original paragraph, verify the student name, class, enrollment date, and homeroom teacher signature, and record the number of citations in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) |
| Transfer application | Whether the names of the transferring-out and transferring-in schools, application date, seals from both parties, and receipt are consistent with the records in the student status record | Compare the school names, dates, and receipt numbers in the two materials item by item, record inconsistencies, and verify the source identifier in quoteList |
| Suspension/resumption materials | Whether the start and end dates of suspension, resumption certificate, and signatures from the school doctor and supervising leader are consistent with the status changes in the student status record | Verify the suspension/resumption dates against the status fields in the student status record, confirm that signatures and receipts are complete, and record the quoteMaxToken budget and array length for separate verification |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items is consistent with the matched materials, and being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, see whether the output is empty while the pipeline continues; record the array length and quoteMaxToken budget for separate verification |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same student's name, class, or date does not match between the student status record and the transfer application. Cause: Material versions were not synchronized, and the old transfer application was not updated along with the student status record.
- Symptom: Suspension/resumption materials lack the school doctor's or supervising leader's signature, and the receipt is missing. Cause: Signature and receipt completeness were not verified when archiving materials, and the version ledger did not record the missing items.
- Symptom: There is no citation marker in the answer, or the cited snippet does not match the original text. Cause: First check whether this round hit anything and which material was hit, then look at trimming, and do not directly attribute it to length trimming.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question with original-text support, verify whether the citation array and markers can point back to the original text, and verify the number of citations in responseData; then ask a question with no matching materials and confirm that the array is empty while the pipeline runs through.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and citations are updated synchronously.
- In the node, verify whether the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models are consistent, open the search parameter panel to verify the values item by item, and verify the source identifier in
quoteList. - Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, see whether the output is empty while the pipeline continues; record the array length and
quoteMaxTokenbudget, and do not compare the two for equality.