What this category's data looks like
Enterprise independent skill talent evaluation involves three types of core materials: the enterprise evaluation filing form, the evaluation specification, and the candidate roster. The filing form comes from the human resources and social security filing process, and its fields include the filing number, occupation name, evaluation level, and seal date; the evaluation specification is compiled by the enterprise technical committee and includes assessment modules, weights, and scoring rules; the roster is summarized by the examination affairs position by batch and includes name, ID number, declared level, and signature field. The three types of materials update at different rhythms: the filing form changes with policy adjustments, the evaluation specification changes with revisions to occupational standards, and the roster rolls forward with registration batches. When entering workflow orchestration, the filing form serves as the compliance baseline, the evaluation specification serves as the scoring basis, and the roster serves as the object list; each undertakes the judgment input for different branches and together they determine how the version ledger and change records are generated and referenced.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branches), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "version ledger and change records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branches. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the evaluation specification: compare the filed occupation name, level, filing number, and seal date item by item | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, compare the field values of the filing form and the evaluation specification, and record discrepancies; reference nodeId to locate the node |
| Evaluation specification | Whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record match across the two materials: compare the assessment module names, weights, and effective date item by item with the filing form | Reference variables in subsequent nodes and run a trial once, checking whether the module names and quantities in the specification match the declared level in the roster |
| Candidate roster | Whether signatures or receipts are complete: whether the candidate signature, examination affairs position signature, and batch receipt date are complete | Trigger a user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and confirm whether the roster signature field is updated synchronously with the branch direction |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate's name is written differently in the roster and the filing form, and the quantity and date also do not match. Cause: The two materials are entered by different positions at different times, lacking unified field mapping and cross-checking steps.
- Phenomenon: After the evaluation specification is revised, the version number is not synchronized to the roster and filing form, and references still point to the old version. Cause: Version changes do not trigger re-judgment of workflow branches, and the old-version traceability chain is broken.
- Phenomenon: The roster lacks the examination affairs position signature or batch receipt, and the filing form's seal date is blank. Cause: After the interaction is completed, the process stops, subsequent nodes do not continue execution according to the branch, and signatures and receipts are not collected.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, confirm that the selection result variables have been passed to subsequent nodes, and check whether the references of variables and nodeId are consistent.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously, confirming that the current version is unique, the old version is traceable, and references are synchronized.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node to ensure that each option corresponds to one branch, avoiding the situation where selecting an option still follows the default branch.
- Trigger a user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and confirm that the process continues downward after the interaction is completed and does not repeatedly enter the interaction in the same session.