What this category's data looks like
In the exam organization and violation handling scenario, three types of materials are commonly kept on hand: the exam manual, the examination room record sheet, and the violation fact record. The exam manual provides the process and the criteria for judgment; the examination room record sheet carries the time, subject, invigilation, and candidate behavior of that particular examination session; the violation fact record focuses on the specific facts, evidence, and handling opinions. The three types of materials jointly enter the version ledger and change record function, each assuming its own source role: the manual is the rule source, the record sheet is the process source, and the fact record is the conclusion source. In terms of update rhythm, the manual changes with institutional adjustments, the record sheet is generated per session, and the fact record is archived per event. Field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, and signatures: the same candidate name, number of violation entries, and date of occurrence must be consistent across the three types of materials, and signatures and receipts must be complete. The version ledger must ensure that the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized; the change record retains the differences before and after changes, for synchronized updates to the knowledge base or external documents.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, which outputs the response body, status code, and returned fields. The version ledger and change record are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled and completed by the external system according to the agreement. The HTTP node is only responsible for sending requests according to the agreement and bringing back the results; it does not replace the external system in writing to the database or approving.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam manual | The process name, number of entries, and effective date in the manual must be consistent with the places referenced in the examination room record sheet and the violation fact record | In the variable panel, check the placeholder sources; in the request preview, view the complete rendered address and fields; compare the same name, quantity, and date across the three materials |
| Examination room record sheet | The session date, invigilation signature, and receipt of the record sheet must correspond to the manual version and the fact record | Check the request header names and value sources; use one sample request to compare the response; check whether the signature and receipt fields are empty |
| Violation fact record | The name, quantity, date, and handling opinion of the fact record must be consistent with the manual criteria and the record sheet | Use variables to reference the output of preceding nodes; check whether the fields returned in responseData include the fact entries and date |
| Version ledger and change record | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, references are synchronized, and the differences before and after changes are queryable | Include the version number and change description in the request body; check the status code and fields returned after Authorization authentication passes |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate name or number of violation entries does not match between two materials. Cause: The version was not synchronized, the old record sheet is still referenced, and it was not updated according to the current manual.
- Symptom: The date of occurrence is inconsistent among the manual, the record sheet, and the fact record. Cause: Only one place was changed during the change, and the referenced places were not refreshed in sync with the version number.
- Symptom: The record sheet lacks the invigilation signature or receipt. Cause: The request body fields are empty, and the external system still returns success after receiving empty fields, without performing required-field validation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample to confirm that all three placeholders variables, responseData, and Authorization can be resolved into actual values.
Business test: change one piece of content, see whether the version number and references are updated in sync, and check whether the old version is still traceable.
- In the variable panel, check the placeholder sources one by one, and confirm that each placeholder can be traced to a global variable, system variable, or the output of a preceding node.
- Use one sample request to compare the response, check the request header names and value sources, and confirm that the authentication information is passed in according to the external system's requirements.