What this category's data looks like
The core materials in the exam organization and violation handling scenario include three types: exam administration manuals, examination room records, and violation fact records. The exam administration manual defines the process and handling standards, the examination room record carries the on-site time, examination room, and invigilator signature, and the violation fact record focuses on candidate information, behavior description, and receipt. The materials come from releases by the exam administration authority and backfilling by test sites, and the update cadence changes with exam batches and rule adjustments. The three types of materials play different roles when entering the workflow: the exam administration manual serves as the basis for judgment for branch references, while the examination room record and violation fact record serve as fact sources for node comparison. Field characteristics are concentrated in four items: name, quantity, date, and signature; version numbers and reference relationships need to be maintained in sync with content changes.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "version ledger and change records" are continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | Whether the fields, date, and signature are consistent with the current version | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm the manual version number and reference location |
| Examination room record | Whether the name, quantity, and date match the violation fact record | Trigger a user selection once, and check the node status and branch direction in the run record |
| Violation fact record | Whether the signature or receipt is complete, and whether the old version is traceable | Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, checking variables and nodeId |
| Version ledger | The current version is unique, the old version is traceable, and references are in sync | After changing one piece of content, check whether the version number and references are updated in sync |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the examination room record and the violation fact record. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately and are not compared using the same field standard.
- Symptom: The exam administration manual has been updated, but the examination room record still references the old version's clauses. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the reference relationship was not updated with the content change.
- Symptom: The violation fact record lacks a signature or receipt, so the handling basis is incomplete. Cause: The material backfilling step did not check the signature field and receipt status.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business test: change one piece of content, and see whether the version number and references are updated in sync.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
- Trigger a user selection once, check the node status and branch direction in the run record, and reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node to run a trial once.