What this category's data looks like
In the regular higher education institution admissions enrollment and filing business, three types of materials—admission plans, filing rules, and admission rosters—enter the version maintenance process simultaneously. Admission plans include institution code, major group, planned number, subject selection requirements, and release date; filing rules include filing ratio, tie-breaking sorting items, batch, and effective date; admission rosters include candidate number, name, score, admitted major, and signature field. The material sources are releases from provincial admissions and examination institutions, institution receipts, and system exports. The update cadence advances by batch, with a new version released before each round of filing, and old versions retained for traceability. When these three types of materials enter this function, admission plans serve as the source of request body fields, filing rules serve as path parameters and judgment criteria, and admission rosters serve as the response body write-back object. The three are connected through the interface to ensure the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The "version ledger and change records" are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by an external system according to the agreement to complete the process. The request URL, path parameters, request headers, and request body can all use variable placeholders, and the variables come from global variables, system variables, or outputs from preceding nodes.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admission plan | Whether the institution code, major group, planned number, subject selection requirements, and release date are consistent with the current version | Compare the fields in the request body with the external interface agreement, and use a sample request to check the return |
| Filing rules | Whether the filing ratio, tie-breaking sorting items, batch, and effective date are consistent with the current version | Check the sources of the path parameter and request header values, and confirm that the placeholder variables can be resolved into actual values |
| Admission roster | Whether the candidate number, name, score, admitted major, and signature field are consistent with the receipt | Check the source of each placeholder in the variable panel, and check whether variables are fully passed in |
| Request header | Authentication information is passed in according to the external system's requirements | Check the Authorization name and value source, and confirm that the request header is rendered correctly |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, score, or date of the same candidate does not match across two materials. Cause: Admission plans and admission rosters are maintained separately, without field-level comparison using the current version as the sole baseline.
- Symptom: An old version of the filing rules is still referenced by an external system. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the reference relationship was not written back after the new version was released, resulting in inconsistency between the current version and the reference.
- Symptom: The admission roster lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: After the interface returns, the signature field and receipt fields were not validated, and the confirmation step was omitted when the external system handled it according to the agreement.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against a sample; check whether the fields in responseData are consistent with the agreement.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously.
- Check the source of each placeholder in the variable panel, and confirm that both
variablesandAuthorizationcan be resolved into actual values. - Use a sample request to compare the return, and check whether the
responseDatafields are consistent with the agreements for admission plans, filing rules, and admission rosters.