What this category's data looks like
The materials for adult college entrance examination registration and admission management are mainly divided into three categories: registration forms, preferential bonus point materials, and admission rosters. The registration form carries the candidate's identity, application level and subject category, photo, and signature confirmation; the preferential bonus point materials carry the bonus item name, certificate number, issue date, and review signature; the admission roster carries the admission batch, major, planned number, and admission conclusion. The three types of materials are often generated by different handling stages. For the same candidate, the name spelling, ID number, bonus point quantity, and dates in two materials may not match. When versions are not synchronized, the old version is still retrieved. When signatures or receipts are missing, it cannot be proven that the material has been confirmed. When materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each serves as a citable original text passage. The node is only responsible for recalling and outputting cited content according to search parameters, and is not responsible for determining which material is the current version. In terms of update rhythm, materials in the registration and admission stages change frequently. Each change should leave a version number, changed fields, and effective date in the ledger, so that old versions can be traced and citations synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The version ledger and change records are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The number of citations is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget. The two are not compared for equality.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Whether fields and dates such as identity information, application level, subject category, photo, and signature confirmation are consistent with the preferential bonus point materials and admission roster | Open the citation marker in the retrieval results, compare field by field against the original text passages, and record differences in names, quantities, and dates |
| Preferential bonus point materials | Whether the bonus item name, certificate number, issue date, and review signature are complete, and whether they correspond to the bonus items filled in the registration form | Run a trial query containing bonus keywords, check the cited array length against the number of matched materials, and inspect the source identifier in quoteList |
| Admission roster | Whether the admission batch, major, planned number, and admission conclusion match the registration form and bonus point materials, and whether signatures or receipts are complete | Open the search parameter panel to check the values, confirm that the recall scope covers the admission roster, and then compare the cited fragments back to the original text |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items is consistent with the matched materials; being empty is also normal, and the output pipeline continues to work | Run a trial query with no matching materials, observe that the array is empty while the pipeline continues, and record the array item count separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: For the same candidate, the name spelling, ID number, bonus point quantity, or dates in the registration form and admission roster do not match. Cause: The two materials are generated by different stages, and field comparison and receipt confirmation have not been performed against the same record.
- Phenomenon: Old-version materials are still retrieved, and the cited fragments are inconsistent with the current version. Cause: Versions are not synchronized; after changes, the ledger and cited sources are not updated, and the old version is not marked invalid.
- Phenomenon: Bonus point materials lack a review signature or the admission roster lacks a receipt, and the cited fragments cannot prove that the material has been confirmed. Cause: Signature and receipt collection is incomplete in the material circulation stage, and retrieval only matches by text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Ask a question with original text support, check whether the cited array and citation markers can point back to the original text passages, and inspect the source identifier in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the pipeline works.
Business test: Change one piece of content and see whether the version number and citations are updated synchronously; if a citation limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text, record the array item count separately, and do not compare it for equality with quoteMaxToken.
- In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models, and open the search parameter panel to check the values item by item.
- For the same record, take cited fragments separately from the registration form, preferential bonus point materials, and admission roster, compare names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts, and write them into the version ledger.