What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the preliminary review scenario for academic journal submissions. The materials include three categories: submitted manuscripts, author information forms, and plagiarism check reports. The submitted manuscript is the primary object of preliminary review, carrying the title, author order, affiliations, funding, dates, and signature fields; the author information form provides author names, ordering, affiliations, contact details, and contribution statements, and is used for comparison with the manuscript; the plagiarism check report provides the detection date, similarity rate range, and the detection agency receipt, and is used for version and date verification. After these three categories of materials enter the scheduled task and automation feature, the trigger configuration is responsible for starting the process at the scheduled time, the tool node is responsible for reading and writing back, and business processing executes or reruns according to records, forming a version ledger and change records, and synchronously updating the knowledge base or external documents. The update cadence uses manuscript registration, preliminary review rejection, and re-review approval as nodes, and the field characteristics center on the consistency of names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the trigger configuration and the tool node (scheduling capability is not in the tool introduction), outputting trigger records and execution results. The version ledger and change records are then completed by business processing executing or rerunning according to records. Tool invocation is decided by the model based on the tool introduction whether to execute; when the model does not need to summarize again, a tool invocation termination node can be attached at the end of the tool to end this invocation.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Submitted manuscript | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures match the author information form and plagiarism check report | Check the title, author order, affiliations, receipt date, and signature fields; look at the process connections and trigger records |
| Author information form | Whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record are consistent across the two materials | Check names, ordering, affiliations, contribution statements, and dates; check the introduction fields |
| Plagiarism check report | Whether the detection date, similarity rate range, and receipt are synchronized with the manuscript version | Check the detection date, agency receipt, and manuscript version number; see which step the termination node is attached to |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized | After changing one piece of content, check whether the version number and references are synchronously updated, and record the rerun results |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the manuscript and the author information form. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and field comparison and receipt retention were not done in the trigger records.
- Symptom: The plagiarism check report has been updated, but the manuscript version number and references are not synchronized. Cause: The version ledger was not written back according to the change records, so old versions are traceable but the current version is not unique.
- Symptom: The scheduled time arrives but execution does not occur, or after execution the model summarizes it again. Cause: The trigger configuration is not connected to the corresponding tool node, or the tool invocation termination node is not attached at the end of the tool.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: look at the trigger records and execution times, and confirm that execution occurs at the scheduled time and only once; when the model does not need to summarize again, confirm that the tool invocation termination node is attached at the end of the tool.
Business test: change one piece of content, see whether the version number and references are synchronously updated, and check whether the version ledger and change records are synchronously written back.
- Check the process connections and trigger records, and confirm that the trigger is connected to the corresponding tool node and that the same task is not executed repeatedly.
- Check the introduction fields and the position of the termination node, and confirm that the tool introduction clearly states when execution should occur, and that when no summary is needed it is attached at the end of the tool.