What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on journal publication license and annual verification materials, including three types of sources: journal publication licenses, annual verification forms, and rectification reports. These materials are submitted by business personnel on a periodic basis, and their update cadence is synchronized with the license validity period, annual verification milestones, and rectification receipts. When entering the knowledge base, the license carries the entity and scope fields, the annual verification form carries the annual data and signature fields, and the rectification report carries the issue and receipt fields. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures. The same record often shows inconsistent names or quantities between the license and the verification form, and missing dates or signatures often appear between the rectification report and the verification form. After the materials enter the retrieval function, each participates in recall as a candidate chunk, and they do not directly generate statistical tables or business documents.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The version ledger and change records are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publication license | Fields: name, quantity, date, and signature; Check: consistent with the corresponding fields in the annual verification form | In the search test, search for the license name, check the name, quantity, and date in the candidate chunks, and record the number of candidates and the score |
| Annual verification form | Fields: annual data, date, and signature; Check: consistent with the corresponding fields in the license and the rectification report | Switch searchMode to hybrid, check the date and signature in the annual verification form candidates, and confirm they do not conflict with the license record |
| Rectification report | Fields: issue description, receipt date, and signature; Check: consistent with the corresponding record in the annual verification form | Search for the rectification report receipt, check the date and signature, and confirm that the candidate chunks retain the key original paragraphs |
| Version ledger and change records | Check: the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized | After changing one piece of content, search again, check the number of candidates and the score, and confirm that the old version is still traceable and references are synchronized |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same record has mismatched names or quantities between the license and the annual verification form. Cause: the two materials have different update cadences, and the old version was not synchronized.
- Symptom: the rectification report date is inconsistent with the verification form receipt date. Cause: the version was not synchronized, and the reference still points to the old version chunk.
- Symptom: there are many candidates, but the top-ranked ones are all irrelevant. Cause: the retrieval mode does not match the material form, or rerank is not enabled.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare the number of candidates and the scores, then toggle rerank on and off to observe the ranking of the top few results; at the same time adjust similarity and limit, observe the cited text tokens after filtering and limit trimming, record the array count separately, and note that usingReRank only affects secondary ranking.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously.
- In the search test, switch
searchMode, compare the number of candidates and scores returned by the semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes, and confirm that they match the material form. - After changing one piece of content, search again, check the name, quantity, date, and signature in the candidate chunks, and confirm that the current version is unique and the old version is traceable.