What this category's data looks like
Progress records and statistical verification for kindergarten play activity organization draw on observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity goal sheets, and reflections converted into next week's plans. Observation records correspond to area plans, material placement quantities are registered by area, activity goal attainment is marked item by item, and reflections converted into next week's plans form a closed loop. The update rhythm is daily recording, weekly aggregation, and monthly verification. When materials enter the HTTP interface and external system functions, observation records and area plans serve as request body fields, material placement quantities serve as path parameters or business data after request header authentication, and activity goal attainment and reflections converted into next week's plans serve as return fields for subsequent nodes to parse. Field characteristics include date, area, material name, quantity, goal number, attainment status, and exception notes.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, which outputs the response body, status code, and return fields. The "progress table and statistical specification description" is parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by the external system according to the agreement to complete the rest. The HTTP node does not replace the external system in writing to the database or approving.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records and area plans | The record count matches the statistical count, and the specification is written in the header | In the request preview, view the complete rendered address, and check whether the path parameters and request body fields correspond to the area plan number |
| Material placement quantities | When materials are insufficient, the exception notes are clearly written, and the quantities match the list | Check the request header names and the sources of their values, and use a sample request to compare the quantity totals in the return fields |
| Activity goal attainment | When goals and observations do not match, mark the exception, and attainment status is traceable item by item | In the variable panel, check the source of each placeholder, and confirm the reference origins of variables, responseData, and Authorization |
| Reflections converted into next week's plans | When the plan is not updated, record the discrepancy, and write the specification and exceptions clearly | Verify the plan number and week number in the return fields, and compare the totals of one week's records |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: Material placement quantities do not match the list. Cause: When materials are insufficient, no exception note is marked in the request body, causing the statistical count to be inflated.
- Phenomenon: Activity goal attainment does not match observation records. Cause: Goals and observations are not updated synchronously, and the return fields still retain the old status.
- Phenomenon: Reflections converted into next week's plans are not updated. Cause: When the plan is not updated, the interface still returns the previous week's fields, and subsequent nodes parse expired data.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and return fields, then compare the results against one sample; confirm that the three identifiers Authorization, variables, and responseData are traceable in the request headers, variable sources, and return fields.
Business test: use one week's records to verify the totals, and see whether the specification and exceptions are clearly written.
- In the request preview, view the complete rendered address, and check whether the three placeholder variables in the path parameters, request body, and request headers are parsed into actual values.
- In the variable panel, check the source of each placeholder, confirm whether it comes from a global variable, system variable, or the output of a preceding node, and use a sample request to compare the return fields.