What this category's data looks like
In the kindergarten play activity organization scenario, materials come from observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity objective tables, and reflection-to-next-week plan tables. Observation records and area plans must correspond item by item, material placement quantities are updated weekly, activity objective achievement is annotated with each activity, and reflection entries are transferred into the next week's plan at the end of the week. When these materials enter workflow orchestration, observation records and area plans serve as input materials for branch judgment, material placement quantities serve as the reconciliation baseline, and activity objective achievement and reflection-to-next-week plan serve as the basis for subsequent nodes to continue execution. The update rhythm is daily recording, weekly aggregation, and monthly reconciliation. Field characteristics include activity name, area, placed materials and quantities, objective entries, observation points, reflection conclusions, and plan adjustment items. The progress table and statistical scope description are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to branches, the scope is written into the table header, and the record count and statistical count must match.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branches), outputting branch direction and interaction state records. The "progress table and statistical scope description" is completed next by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to branches. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Correspondence between observation records and area plans | Whether the area activity entries in the observation records correspond item by item with the area plans, and whether non-corresponding entries are marked as exceptions | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and reference variables to see whether the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes |
| Material placement quantities | Whether the material placement quantities satisfy the activity objectives in the area plans, and whether insufficient items have exception handling written into the table header scope | Trigger a user selection node once, check the node status in the run record, and verify the branch direction corresponding to nodeId |
| Activity objective achievement and reflection-to-next-week plan | Whether activity objective achievement is consistent with the observation records, and whether reflection conclusions have been transferred into the next week's plan and the plan table has been updated | Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, and verify whether the two types of inconsistency—objective and observation mismatch, and plan not updated—are written into the scope |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: material placement quantities do not match the quantities required by the area plans, and a gap appears in the statistical total. Cause: when materials are insufficient, exceptions are not marked in the table header scope, and record counts and statistical counts are directly added together.
- Phenomenon: activity objective achievement records are inconsistent with the descriptions in the observation records, and the weekly report total cannot explain the difference. Cause: entries where objectives and observations do not match are not listed separately, and the scope is not written into the table header.
- Phenomenon: reflection conclusions remain in the records, the next week's plan table is not synchronously updated, and the progress table is disconnected from the plan. Cause: when the plan is not updated, statistics are still calculated according to the old plan, and branch direction does not record plan adjustment items.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and that variables and nodeId are queryable in the run record.
Business test: use one week of records to reconcile the total, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written, and whether the four items—correspondence between observation records and area plans, material placement quantities, activity objective achievement, and reflection-to-next-week plan—are checked item by item.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and after triggering a user selection node once, check the node status and branch direction in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, and verify whether the table header of the progress table and statistical scope description clearly states the scope that the record count and statistical count match, as well as exception entries.