What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the progress record and statistical verification scenarios in primary and secondary school admissions enrollment organization. The materials come from three categories: admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The admissions plan contains schedule milestones, batches, and responsible position fields; the application material checklist contains student name, ID number, material name, and receipt date; the admission list contains admission batch, name, number of people, and publicity date. These materials are updated according to the admissions season, batches, and publicity rhythm. When entering the knowledge base retrieval function, the admissions plan serves as the source of definitions, while the application material checklist and admission list serve as the source of records. Together, the three support the verification of the progress table and the statistical definition statement.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The progress table and statistical definition statement are completed by subsequent nodes or manually. The retrieval service is only responsible for providing candidates and scores; it does not generate statistical tables or business documents.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields include batch, schedule milestones, and responsible position; dates and signatures are complete | In the search test, use synonymous questions to retrieve, compare candidate snippets and similarity scores, and verify the plan version and signature column |
| Application material checklist | Fields include name, ID number, material name, and receipt date; quantity and dates can be verified | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, see whether candidates simultaneously contain checklist and list records, and verify names and quantities |
| Admission list | Fields include admission batch, name, number of people, and publicity date; receipts and signatures are complete | Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, and check whether the dates and numbers of people in the list and the checklist are consistent |
| Statistical definition statement | Definitions are written in the header, and exceptional cases have textual explanations | Use one week of records to verify the totals, view the number of candidates and scores after similarity filtering, and confirm whether exceptions are clearly stated |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, or date of the same student in the application material checklist and the admission list do not match. Cause: The two material versions are not synchronized, or the entry was not verified according to unified definitions.
- Phenomenon: The batch dates in the admissions plan are inconsistent with the publicity dates in the admission list. Cause: The list was not synchronized after the plan was updated, or missing signatures and receipts make the version unconfirmable.
- Phenomenon: There are many candidate snippets, but the ones ranked at the top are unrelated to the progress records. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, or rerank and similarity filtering were not adjusted according to the definitions.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and similarity scores, then toggle rerank on and off to observe the ranking of the top few; record the number of candidates and scores, and verify the searchMode and similarity settings.
Business test: Use one week of records to verify the totals, and see whether definitions and exceptions are clearly stated; record the number of citations according to array length, and view the citation content budget separately via quoteMaxToken.
- In the search test, switch
searchMode, compare semantic, full-text, and hybrid recall candidates, and confirm that the material form matches the mode. - Enable or disable
usingReRank, compare the ranking of the top few, and check whether the number of candidates and scores aftersimilarityfiltering are stable.