What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of developing talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges. The materials include three types: talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis forms. The talent cultivation program contains the major name, program duration, cultivation objectives, course structure, credit hours and credits, implementation date, and approval signatures; the course standard contains the course name, corresponding job, credit hour allocation, assessment method, and teaching and research office signature; the job competency analysis form contains the job name, competency items, corresponding courses, analysis date, and professional leader signature. The material sources are exports from the academic affairs system, submissions from teaching and research offices, and receipts from the professional construction committee. The update rhythm is centralized submission for each revision round, with incremental supplementary entries within the week. After entering workflow orchestration, the talent cultivation program serves as the main record, while the course standard and job competency analysis form serve as supporting records, respectively undertaking the roles of course support and job mapping. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three must be aligned within the same progress table.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the workflow node (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "Progress Table and Statistical Caliber Description" is continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and records the workflow status. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | Major name, program duration, cultivation objectives, course structure, credit hours and credits, implementation date, and approval signatures are complete | Check fields and dates one by one, verify whether approval signatures and receipts are attached, and record missing items |
| Course standard | Course name, corresponding job, credit hour allocation, assessment method, and teaching and research office signature are consistent with the talent cultivation program | Compare item by item against the course structure of the talent cultivation program for name, credit hours, and dates, and check signatures |
| Job competency analysis form | Job name, competency items, corresponding courses, analysis date, and professional leader signature correspond to the course standard | Verify the mapping between competency items and courses, check the analysis date and signature, and record inconsistencies |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, the interaction status is recorded, and the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes | Check options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger once to view the run record, reference variables in subsequent nodes and test run, and verify the status corresponding to nodeId |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course name, credit hour quantity, and implementation date of the same record do not match between the talent cultivation program and the course standard. Cause: The two materials were entered separately and were not checked against a unified field and date caliber.
- Symptom: The course standard version is not synchronized and still references the old version of the talent cultivation program. Cause: After revision, centralized submission was not made, and incremental supplementary entries did not cover supporting materials.
- Symptom: The job competency analysis form lacks the professional leader signature or the teaching and research office receipt. Cause: The submission step did not list signatures and receipts as completion conditions.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test run each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, confirm that options correspond one-to-one with branches, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and verify the variables and nodeId records.
Business test: use one week of records to check the totals, see whether the caliber and exceptions are clearly stated, and confirm that the number of records matches the statistical count and that the caliber is written in the table header.
- In the user selection node, check options and branch connections one by one, trigger once, and then view the node status and branch direction in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and test run once, verify the correspondence between
variablesandnodeId, and confirm that the process continues after the interaction is completed.