What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on abnormal traceability and manual review materials in the kindergarten safety protection and emergency drill category. Sources include daily inspection records, hazard rectification forms, drill plans and sign-in sheets, access control and school bus checklists, and responsible person signature pages. The update rhythm advances through daily inspections, weekly summaries, monthly drills, and quarterly reviews. Field characteristics are mainly timestamps, check item numbers, responsible persons, rectification deadlines, number of participants, and abnormal descriptions. When materials enter workflow orchestration, hazard items and rectification deadlines are used to determine whether the loop is closed, drill participant counts and sign-ins are used to verify consistency with the plan, access control and school bus check items are used to identify omissions, and responsible person signatures are used to confirm that review conclusions are traceable. The abnormal list and review conclusions are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along branches, and the original records are retained as source materials for traceability.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "abnormal list and review conclusions" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along branches. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard rectification form | Whether hazard items and rectification deadlines are closed, and whether unclosed items are marked with reasons | Compare hazard items and rectification deadlines one by one, verify pre- and post-rectification records and responsible person signatures, and confirm the closure status |
| Drill sign-in sheet | Whether the number of drill participants and sign-ins are consistent with the plan, and whether missing sign-ins are explained | Check the number of participants and sign-ins against the drill plan, and inspect plan change records and responsible person signatures |
| Access control and school bus checklist | Whether check items are omitted, and whether missing items have supplementary inspection records | Check access control and school bus check items one by one, and verify supplementary inspection times and responsible person signatures |
| Abnormal list | Whether abnormalities are supported by original records, and whether the reviewer has signed | Trace original records by nodeId, reference variables to check branch directions, and confirm review conclusions |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The hazard rectification form shows closed, but the original inspection record still marks it as unhandled. Cause: The rectification deadline and closure determination were not bound to the original record, and the reviewer did not check signatures one by one.
- Phenomenon: The record is archived using the planned count despite a different number of actual drill sign-ins. Cause: Plan changes were not synchronized to the sign-in sheet, and the review step did not compare differences between the plan and sign-ins.
- Phenomenon: The access control and school bus checklist has omissions, but the abnormal list does not reflect them. Cause: Check items were not checked one by one, supplementary inspection records were missing, and responsible person signatures did not cover the omitted items.
How to verify the setup
This function acceptance: run through each option, check the branch directions and interaction status in the run records, and confirm that variables and nodeId are correctly referenced in subsequent nodes.
Business test: create an abnormal record, see whether it can be traced to the source material, and check hazard items and rectification deadlines, drill participant counts and sign-ins, access control and school bus check items, and responsible person signatures.
- At the user selection node, check options and branch connections one by one, trigger once, and then view the node status and interaction status in the run records.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run once to confirm that the branch direction is consistent with the interaction status record, and that the abnormal list can be traced back to the original record.